In the modern era, the school is regarded as one of the key factors contributing to the preparation of people for their future profession. One of the heated debates in this realm is associated with the types of courses that should be included in the school’s core curriculum. Many people adhere to the view that the topics should be focused on one subject while others believe that students must be encountered with a variety of courses with different topics. I strongly contend that it’s more effective to study different topics. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First, studying various subjects gives you the opportunity to become acquainted with different fields so that you can find your passion in one of them. Although you might find a better job if you are specialized in some topics, if you study many topics there are a lot of options in front of you for your future occupation. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. 4 years ago, when I entered the university to study computer engineering, students had to select their major between computer architecture, software engineering, and information technology. Not knowing about the courses and their syllabus made this choice a tough one. I opt for computer architecture but in my perspective, some of our required topics are not convenient for this major and sometimes I regret it. On the other hand, computer students that arrived at the university in the next year were given the opportunity to select their preference after three years when they had passed some related courses to all of the majors and were partly familiar with them.
Secondly, it increases your versatility. Starting a new job doesn’t require a deep knowledge or many years of experience. Although these features are considered positive points, having a piece of general information about the profession and willingness to be successful and trying hard for it can also do the work. For example, as I mentioned, nowadays computer students become familiar with all aspects of computer engineering. They study algorithms, digital design, programming, operating systems, etc. As a result, when they want to look for a job, knowing many skills brings them a lot of choices. Even Though a student may go for information technology major, he also has expertise in other fields and can handle the relevant jobs.
In conclusion, I’m of the opinion that studying different subjects is better. This is because it makes you versatile and you can easily find what you are good at.
- 08/11/2017You recently noticed a local restaurant that was offering a part-time job.Write a letter to the restaurant's manager. In your letter,. explain that you would like to apply for the job. give some details of any relevant experience that you have. 61
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of 76
- TPO- 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 996, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...they had passed some related courses to all of the majors and were partly familiar with th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i feel, in conclusion, of course, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05373831776 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8476957186 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535046728972 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4942300913 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181371734137 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510668609204 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567819227453 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118876424715 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332984964639 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.