Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree with the proposed statement. In my perspective, it will be better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another. Some people love to live in many places in their lives, and they say that they enjoy this kind of life, but I do not agree with them for some reason that I have mentioned them below.
First, When we decide to live in a place, we will have to make a living in that place; I mean that we buy a house, many pieces of furniture, a TV, an Oven, and many other things. Transporting those devices is not so easy all the time, and they will damage or be broken. For example, I had a friend who was our neighbor. She and her husband did not live in one place. They have always been moving from one town to another. She said to me that her husband prefers this kind of life, but she was complaining that her furniture is getting damaged every time they are relocating. Also, relocating caused them many costs, and she was not happy about it.
Second, moving from one place to another will harm the children's relationships and their education. When a family is always relocating, children have to go to many different schools at one level of their educating, so their teachers will change. Any teacher has his way. As a result, children will have to adapt themselves to many teachers, this is so difficult and sometimes make the children confused. For example, my uncle changed his place because he was a businessman, and he thought it is necessary. His son is a smart boy, but changing schools, he was confused by teaching methods. Now he has problems with his lessons. Besides, my uncle's son had to leave his friends all the time. He had not many friends, and he was unhappy and alone.
To sum up, according to what I mentioned and exampled. I can conclude that living in one place will be better.
- In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jar contained a copper cylinder surrounding an iron rod. The 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed towards young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO.25 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... costs, and she was not happy about it. Second, moving from one place to another...
^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ways relocating, children have to go to many different schools at one level of their educating...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, for example, i mean, kind of, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37209302326 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42007865415 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6191692201 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.619047619 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.380952381 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253148960114 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082310527211 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112832361878 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18748122175 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13329880921 0.0645574589148 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.3 11.7677419355 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.77 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.