Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Material to research has attracted much social concern. Many educators around the world argue that it is better to use printed material to research than it is to use the internet. Personally, I disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, work performance draws much of my attention. It is widely known that using internet people are likely to easily access information. Therefore, it is possible for them to save a great deal of time. Hence, they are certain to have more time to focus on the problem that they are working on. As a result, their work performance is highly likely to be improved. More interestingly, by using the internet to research, people stand a golden chance to see this problem in many perspectives. There is a likelihood for them to carefully analyze and consider all solutions. Thus, they able to choose the best solution for the problem that they are working on. As a consequence, they are likely to improve their work performance. Without a doubt, using the internet to research brings many benefits for users.
On the other hand, it is claimed that much information on the internet is wrong which leads to misunderstanding problems. However, it is just applicable to a minority. The information on prestige pages always carefully be censored. People also have the ability to distinguish which information is wrong or right. Furthermore, using the internet creates a golden chance for people to acquire search skills which is very helpful for them in their future careers. In addition, they are certain to access a great deal of information on the internet. Therefore, they are bound to have comprehensive knowledge about problems. As a result, their work problem is fully resolved. Beyond any doubt, the internet has many positive effects on users.
All in all, work performance is a convincing reason for my argument. It is highly recommended that people should carefully consider my writing to make the right decision on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | Sinara Furlani | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Sushmabenarji | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | skmsamu | 83 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | kathishivaram | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Afruzi | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Many people believe that formal "pen and paper" examinations are not the best method of asessing education achievement. Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 65
- it is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts more than it is for them to learn facts 60
- some parents give their children money for each high grade they get in school 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, thus, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02134146341 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87277155443 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469512195122 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7363347754 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.625 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169473285496 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509427050573 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852387505055 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139073662874 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141104246733 0.0645574589148 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.