do you agree or disagree with the following statement. It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet.
In today’s modern life, thanks to the technological breakthroughs and cutting-edge innovations in every section of science, the way of tackling to complications, has altered dramatically. Some people are of the opinion that we can continue just as old days and ignoring such technological advanced, while others challenge the idea and argue that although internet ,as a serious part of contemporary societies, plays a crucial rule in science, expired materials namely printed one’s are more reliable than internet. I personally, adhere to the view that internet cannot far apart from our scientific life; hence, printed materials are out of date, indeed, the problem of accessibility. In the following paragraphs my reasons will be elaborated on in more detail.
To commence with, nowadays, we cannot deny the fact that on-line sources are much more updates rather than printed academic stuffs such as books, articles, and journals. generally speaking, it would be one of the most advantages of internet to keep things in a top ultimate origin. it means most scientists, for instance, present their novelty ideas and approaches in a variety of academic web sites, receiving comments and opinions of their colleges throughout the world. However, what I mentioned above might not be generalized to the whole context. I recently, have searched for a last result of an experiment in my field of study, which it was hold in America, nevertheless, it has been published in a printed book, therefore, neither does it available for me to take it, nor can I pay the cost of boo.
The second reason why I believe internet is better than other materials for research is that it is easily accessible by a simple click on the sites, seeking, and browsing through the net we would have enormous data. In fact, researchers tend to find their needs as soon as it would be possible, contributing to accelerate their research. As a case in point, it would not be exaggerated if I clam in every second, new things such as inventions, discoveries, or innovations are happened. In addition, for improving the quality of academic stuffs, research systems demand a web proses to assess them. For example, every academic article should be developed by references; just as references help other researches to understand better the context of a paper, so do they improve the quality and capability of the article. To delve more into it, first, publishers look at references and measure its level based on how many papers and articles reference to them and then decide about the quality of the work. Were academic societies do not access to the internet, we would not have variety in publishing.
Drawing upon the reasons that I mentioned above, I believe that its merits, I mean using internet, overweight its demerits. Not only does it provide the last version and updates of everything ranging from games to academic stuffs, but also the point of accessibility to internet makes our academic research more easier and more practical that the past times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | Sinara Furlani | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Sushmabenarji | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | skmsamu | 83 | view |
| 2021-12-08 | kathishivaram | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Afruzi | 73 | view |
- tpo38 3
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 76
- Small town got extra money Do you think it is better to spend money to build a park to provide entertainment for everyone in the town or to build a sports ground for a high school without a sports field 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 90
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing TaskEvery year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he idea and argue that although internet ,as a serious part of contemporary societ...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
... such as books, articles, and journals. generally speaking, it would be one of the most a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...o keep things in a top ultimate origin. it means most scientists, for instance, pr...
^^
Line 13, column 308, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...to internet makes our academic research more easier and more practical that the past times....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, while, apart from, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2553.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09580838323 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90989213565 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566866267465 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5794683317 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.833333333 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207324784418 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552626391153 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411602499478 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107572802077 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311639964999 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.