Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
It is impossible to be completely honest with your friend.
Throughout history, human beings have always been seeking to make effective social bonds, which friendship is the most prominent among them, for the sake of happiness in their lives. They have always been concerned about the ways by which they could have had a happy and long-lasting friendship. Since one of the momentous factors in this regard is honesty the controversial question which arises here is whether we can be completely honest with our friend or not. As I am concerned, sometimes, honestly does not help to keep a friendship. In what follows, I elucidate my point of view.
The first aspect to point out is that telling the truth does not always make progress in friendship. In other words, there are some situations a friend should avoid honestly and tell a white lie to keep his friendship. This situation is usually rare but has a significant role in saving relationship which has been on the verge of breaking down. Take a personal momentous back to my high school for exemplification, I had a conflict of interest on an issue which had kept our relations on a break. After a while, I asked a friend of ours who lived in his dormitory to find his remark about me. Had our mutual tell the truth and not encouraged me to call him, I would not have been able to reclaim our friendship.
Another noteworthy point supporting my opinion is that somehow in a friendship it does not seem to be necessary to tell a friend all the facts. Friendship is believed to be a relation whose two parties should attempt to raise its quality and accordingly make progress in it. Nevertheless, being completely honest might hurts the relationship especially when a person needs to be stimulated by a friend’s praise. For instance, consider an athlete who is training for a competition. Obviously, in the beginning, he should be admired and motivated by his friends although he looks amateur in their eyesight. In this situation, not only does being honest and telling reality not help a friend but also might impact negatively and hinder a friend to keep working out.
In summary, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that to have a long-lasting friendship it demanded that sometimes we could disguise honesty. That is to say, depending on the condition it founds that more advisable to say unreality to keep a bond strong.
- Some companies provide important products or service but also damage environment Some people believe that government should require more penalty higher tax and larger fine of these companies while others believe there are better ways Which do you prefer 76
- Which one is the most important factor to help you work productively 1 Having an environment free of noise and distractions 2 Knowing that you will receive a reward 3 Doing something you are interested in 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is impossible to be completely honest with your friend 84
- Do you agree that people should always participate in the activities that they are good at or talented in 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, honestly, if, look, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in summary, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82133995037 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87942781764 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2090687949 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.263157895 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143116389224 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044703624896 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605358858059 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798959105574 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667632980959 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, honestly, if, look, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in summary, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82133995037 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87942781764 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2090687949 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.263157895 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143116389224 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044703624896 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605358858059 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798959105574 0.150856017488 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667632980959 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.