Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this progressive and developing world, where we live occupation time plays an important role in our life. In this vein, human beings try to find the best way to govern work time for having enjoyable life. Some individuals prefer work longer hour for limited days; however, others believe shorter hour in five days is more enjoyable. Personally speaking, I agree with the latter group due to the two reasons which I will support in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, it is crystal clear that going to work five days beside short hour can help people to manage their days very well. In this fact, if persons go to work for short hours five days, they will be able to use the remain times of days by a constant plan. To illustrate, when individuals oblige to work only three days for long hour they lost these three days completely. To put it into a more vivid picture, my own experience can be a compelling example, 2 years ago, when I was working in a food company, our manager decided to give employees a chance to opt their work days between two group, one group 3days for long hours and others five days for short hour. I chose second group, and I have had a friend chosen first group. Simultaneously, me and my friend decided to study English. Having seen him three months later, due to the working long hour in three days, not only did he loose his time managing but also exhausted and angry without any studying because in the off days he just did rest and sleep. Had he chosen second group, he could manage his days and study English.
Second, working three days with longer hour may have negative influence on both of employees and clients. In addition, there are some clients who should complete their work on a specific day, without employees on that day their work become uncompleted. As an illustration, when I wanted to do my graduation process last year, I squander two weeks for just a signature. Having gone several time to office I found that the expert who should signature my letter worked just two days from 7in the morning till 8 at night. Finally, I went office in her work day, that was longest row I have ever seen. Consequently, not only did she get exhausted due to many clients but also clients obliged to wait long hours.
To sum up, having considered the aforementioned reasons into account, I believe that working for shorter hours during five days is more beneficial since it provides the person a sense of balanced life with consistency and it will also increase the productivity and efficiency of the job both for the person and client.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- One of your classmates needs help with some schoolwork Which solution would you recommend your classmate should do to as you for help or to find a professional tutor for help 65
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday rather than when they do similar tasks all day long 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...urs five days, they will be able to use the remain times of days by a constant plan. To il...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
...thers five days for short hour. I chose second group, and I have had a friend chosen f...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 897, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ong hour in three days, not only did he loose his time managing but also exhausted an...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1037, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to second'
Suggestion: to second
... just did rest and sleep. Had he chosen second group, he could manage his days and stu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...weeks for just a signature. Having gone several time to office I found that the expert who s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the longest'.
Suggestion: was the longest
...ly, I went office in her work day, that was longest row I have ever seen. Consequently, not...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the job both for the person and client.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61605206074 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4515961506 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527114967462 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.201144579 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2631578947 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414327443679 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129243209046 0.076458572812 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773139254365 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260136562995 0.150856017488 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128842556436 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.