Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is generally assumed that work days of a job plays a paramount role on one's satisfaction. Therefore, the importance of work hours for being an successful person in our job shall by no means be overlocked. While some people might hold fewer days work with long hours is better, others do disapprove of this opinion, asserting that a full week job like five days per week is more likely to enjoyable. I however, am of this opinion that working five days per week is more please for the following reasons.
First and most obvious, we cannot lose sight of the fact that with five days per week, people can do better time management. Strictly speaking, when someone goes to work for a whole week, time table is more flexible to arrange different planes. The best example that fits into this argument is when you are completely aware about your worksing hours you can use and planing ahead for some extra activity, while working for limited days make a lot of challengee every week about off days from work and you cannot plane any think in advance. It leaves no doubts that working ,for instance, five days has more advanteges.
Another equally important point to consider is working as a full time employee make more career prospect for people. In essence, your superior or boss can have a better evaluation of your performance and it is more likely to get a promotion on five days work. For the purpose of illustration, let's consider the issue of working in a big companie, your superior see you every day, and can see all aspects of your work and effort, it has a positive effect on them to consider you as a committed person to work and it has a significant impact on a boss. It goes without saying that a full time work make better vision of an employee.
In the final analysis, some might content that working three days per week has more advantages associated with, I take issue with that and I believe this mind-set is nothing but a tunnel vision that fails to consider the importance of career prospect that it reflect in a full-time job. In the grand scheme of things, it behooves people think rational about the future and the progress in their career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 80
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 63
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 71
- n the United States medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms However there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in elec 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... the importance of work hours for being an successful person in our job shall by n...
^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dvance. It leaves no doubts that working ,for instance, five days has more advante...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...rtant point to consider is working as a full time employee make more career prospect for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...n a boss. It goes without saying that a full time work make better vision of an employee....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6149870801 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44333521222 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496124031008 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3976239079 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6428571429 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425457929836 0.236089414692 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153206361232 0.076458572812 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787034067942 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261254597482 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968811394851 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.