There are several approaches on the issue of the efficient organization of the working week as regards the duration of the working days and working hours. At the same time, the latter question may also be regarded from the personal perspective in the sense that almost everyone has their preferences on how to organize working time and leisure. Personally, I am prone to believe that it is much more preferable to work long hours and /for/ less days a weak than to have an ordinary five day workload. I hold this opinion since it /this/ would enable a person to spend more time on learning new things; and short working week would definitely provide broader opportunities for a fuller private life.
To begin with, it is proved by psychologists that one of the most enjoyable things for an individual is their ability to explore new things, meet new people, to gain new knowledge and skills. Therefore, if a person has enough time for those activities, they would feel themselves happier /happy/ unless it harms their professional career. For instance, I am a legal practitioner and I work in a law firm with quite a severe /large/ workload. That is the reason why I do not manage to discover new things in my life, and I feel myself a sort of incomplete person in that sense. Thus, the more you are able to spend on learning, the happier /the more satisfied/ you are.
Additionally, the modern life is hectic, and it keeps people away from their families. This in turn becomes a real source of dissatisfaction especially if it is caused by tough working schedule. Spending time with close relatives, on the other hand, secures high mood and healthier life. For example, I have to work five days a week, and, although I finish my work at 7 pm, I feel tired after daily routine and /I am/ not able to enjoy spending time with my family members. Consequently, the shortened option of the working week would be a better solution for paying attention to our beloved people.
To sum up briefly, it would be better to work three days a week. The explanation to this is mainly twofold: first, we would have more possibilities to explore the world; and, second, our lives would be happier thanks to the opportunity to spend more time with our close relatives.
- This material addresses the question of whether ethanol fuel is a good alternative to gasoline in the Northern America. The reading passage suggests that the disadvantages of ethanol fuel outweigh its advantages. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes t 78
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support you 70
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 60
- strange sounds, which were being heard by Soviet submarines' crews in the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean for nearly twenty years, until the 1980s. 81
- The extended family is less important now than in the past. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...preferable to work long hours and /for/ less days a weak than to have an ordinary fi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 492, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'workload' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'workloads'.
Suggestion: workloads
... weak than to have an ordinary five day workload. I hold this opinion since it /this/ wo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, as regards, for example, for instance, i feel, sort of, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68010075567 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6804842437 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546599496222 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1012316212 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8125 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 5.45110844103 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298124835628 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101136301512 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798199539125 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181337476838 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455505266464 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.