As a person who enjoys leisure time to cultivate habits, I prefer an arrangement that makes my spare time longer and concentrates the time I need to work. As a result, I agree with the statement that it is more enjoyable to work only three days a week for long hours than to work five days a week for shorter hours.
In modern society, the quality of people's life is not only judged by the money you earn, but also the freedom that you can develop your own interests. For example, my favorite habit is going biking. Every weekend, I ride my bicycle along the river to enjoy the breeze flow my face. The biking process not only makes my body stronger, but also relaxes me from the whole week of intensely working. After one day of relaxing procedure, I can make myself more concentrated on the new tasks I have to do in the next week. The efficiency of working is also enhanced. Besides biking, I also like to learn new things online in my leisure time. For example, my job is a data scientist, so I will watch many courses about natural language processing and deep learning from some universities. After access to these courses, I can apply them to my work, which is really helpful for me. If I have more leisure time to go biking and go watching online courses, it really helps me to build a more fulfilled mindset when continuing to the work of the next week.
For the aspect of the project manager, a more concentrated work arrangement is also good for production. For example, my current job content is all about coding. If I arrange all the tasks in few days, I will not lose the mind stream that I used to handle each problem. With this concentration, I can work a whole day long with high efficiency. On the other hand, if I need to split a huge task into many small segments and do them in five days, my workflow will be interrupted. I need to figure out what I have done before digging into the problem I did yesterday. It is a costly procedure. It will be better for me if I can finish the job at a higher intensity in three days.
In the aspects of both relaxation and efficiency, I prefer to work only three days a week for longer hours than to work five days a week for shorter hours. By doing so, I can have more time to build my mindset and also be more concentrated on the tasks I need to do. It makes me have a better life in my own style.
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field 78
- Do agree or disagree when teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 60
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, really, so, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1920.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27616926503 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45360115548 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465478841871 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4369496217 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4782608696 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4347826087 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371860231824 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105594251784 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123209534547 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275714135368 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085283404369 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.54 10.9000537634 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.