Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical.
No one can cast a shadow of a doubt on the fact that the government should provide money for things that are beautiful and practical things. A controversial question is often raised regarding this issue that in the adverse condition, spending money for beautiful things is more important in comparison the practical things or not. Some people believe that beautiful things are more significant because the government by spending on beautiful things such as magnificent malls can attract tourist and earn so much money. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that spending money on practical things is necessary and I support my viewpoint with two reasons.
first of all, if the government ignores the practical thing in the country, encounters with the adverse condition and the government have to spend more money to eradicate the drawbacks. For example, public transportation is so practical in the country and if the government ignore this facility for people, people have to utilize private vehicle and it leads to pollution and traffic through the city. Hence, the government should spend more money to control pollution and traffic. In addition, the government by spending money for practical thing such as support the scientist or construct schools in rural can reach to the high technology in the long run, because develop the technology make many tasks easier and affordable. For instance, innovate the equips for ideal irrigation is beneficial for the country and they can prevent the waste of water. so, government by spending for practical ways can optimize its' budget.
Furthermore, the government by supporting the companies can make the urge to care to beautiful things in the country. For example, if the government bestow the tasks for companies which build beautiful construction through the cities, companies will be encouraged to obtain income from their project that helps to become beautiful. then, companies erratic so beautiful constructions such as malls, restaurants, and others and they attract so many tourists in the city that has far advantageous for companies and the government. Moreover, government by supporting manufacturers can eliminate so many imports and have so more export which is beneficial for the economic situation of the country.
To sum up, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that government should pay attention in the necessary facilities which people need them in first preference and then plan to spend for the appearance of cities.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A person who plans well and works carefully is more likely to succeed than a person who takes risks. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the parents should let children make mistake and let them learn from their own mistakes 53
- When making major purchase (for example, car or laptop), our decisions can be influenced by different sources of information. Explain how each of the following sources of information can influence your decision. (1) Recommendations from friends or colleag 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern agriculture does damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No one can cast a shadow of a doubt on t...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upport my viewpoint with two reasons. first of all, if the government ignores ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 7, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
... my viewpoint with two reasons. first of all, if the government ignores the p...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 862, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...nd they can prevent the waste of water. so, government by spending for practical w...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...actical ways can optimize its budget. Furthermore, the government by sup...
^^^
Line 4, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
...project that helps to become beautiful. then, companies erratic so beautiful constru...
^^^^
Line 4, column 701, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the economic situation of the country. To sum up, all of the aforementio...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 19, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... of the country. To sum up, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.0752688172 334% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31407035176 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92490479398 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472361809045 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6958627186 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370062939393 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154655620048 0.076458572812 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644761897843 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230999474255 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115722291208 0.0645574589148 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.