Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them.
In this modern era, one of the most dominant aspects of life is friendship. People are not capable of choosing their family; however, they choose their friends by themselves. Therefore, it becomes essential how does anybody want to communicate with their friends. The controversial question which arises here is whether it is necessary to choose friends that satisfy your entertainment aspect of life than to choose friends that will help you when you need them. I contend that the fun element is much essential. In what follows, I will try to provide some reasons to support my statement.
First and foremost, nowadays, the world becomes so complicated in a way that influences anything in people’s lives, especially in their rapport. Anybody struggle with their personal life and, do not have sufficient time to help others. Therefore, it is not proper to expect friends to help us when we need them. As a supportive case to my point, there was research in one of the west universities about the longevity of a friendship which involves about 2000 people. The conclusion has shown that people who do not choose their friends to help their needs last efficiently more than people choose their friends in a way to answer their help.
The other equally important reason is that today, people need more intimacy in their life. Through this modern technology and this robotic life, people need someone to have fun with and get relieved about their problem for a few hours when they are spending with their friends. There is always a solution to any needs with the help of websites, agencies, etc.. Therefore, people should not waste time helping each other instead of having a lot of fun. I delve into a personal experience to support my statement. Whenever I took a look at people in my life, there are always a few ones that their friendship with me last for so many years, and when I pay more attention to it, I understand that they are one’s whim I spend my time with them having fun.
In conclusion, I would like to consider the point that people face a lot of problems in their life. Therefore, the best and most way to ignore problems for some hours is to have a friend who can laugh at problems. Besides, once a philosopher said: “friends that you can have fun with are a dominant choice to share your needs to them.”
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-09 | porteghale Abiasli | 71 | view |
| 2021-11-05 | Maryam_zn | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-16 | soheila123 | 71 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | pouyasoltan | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them 68
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...with the help of websites, agencies, etc.. Therefore, people should not waste time...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73529411765 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5651825425 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482843137255 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1601435405 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364919892678 0.236089414692 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108597488415 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112821248833 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244864291911 0.150856017488 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707036194696 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.