News has been influenced our life in various ways. Nowadays, most politicians and strategists are using news presenters as an efficient tool to shape people's minds for their advantages. As a result, some beliefs converge around that people should not rely on a specific person or others who have similar views; on the other hand, some are not agreeing with them. Personally, I am of the opinion that using unbiased news tellers are more reliable because of the reasons that I am going to explain in the following essay.
First of all, news sources do not provide us all of the truth. News always has more complicated aspects that might a journalist is releasing. All persons, without a doubt, are related to the political parties. Some of them are supported by them, and others depend on the ongoing situation, pursuing complicated aims. Eventually, the reporter who we are enthusiastically following tells the story for their interest, so maybe some critical parts of the information remain untold. My experience demonstrates an example of this matter. About a few months ago, a tribble accident happened in my neighborhood. A very tall building was on fire, and firefighters were trying to rescue people captured by the fire. Meanwhile, a reporter started to show this accident as an intentional act of the residents to cheat the insurance company while it was not. Few days after that report, it was revealed that the man was a friend of the CEO of the insurance company, and they were trying to escape from their obligations.
Second, it is beneficial to know various thoughts and have unbiased opinions. We live in a world where there are chances to easily meet a wide variety of beliefs by the news. We can do it by listening to different information—requiring different opinions, having open minds when we hear a story, and looking for another aspect that might be missed. For example, when my friend was telling me a story about some conflicts with the student office, I looked at it in a different way. Finally, I could help him to settle.
In conclusion, I believe that we have to follow various news reporters with different points of view because it helps us to know all the trues and teaches us to hear thoughts and be unbiased that I have present in detail.
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 70
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the politicians') or simply say ''most politicians''.
Suggestion: most of the politicians; most politicians
...ced our life in various ways. Nowadays, most of politicians and strategists are using news presente...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... similar views, on the other hand, some are not agreeing with them. Personally, I am of the opin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... of all, news sources do not provide us all of the true. A news has always more complex as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: News
...rces do not provide us all of the true. A news has always more complex aspects that mi...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... the story for their interest, so maybe some of the important parts of the story remain unt...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 768, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('intentionally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('act') instead of another adjective.
...porter started to show this accident as an intentionally act of the residents to cheat insurance com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...t opinion and having open minds when we are hearing a story, and tries to look for another ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, may, second, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73316708229 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64870777696 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538653366584 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.707544699 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.05 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154558513054 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388950917006 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379480552668 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101173465441 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372544266582 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.