Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

If the aim is to benefit the country, what facility should government spend on? Although some believe improving internet access stands as priority choice, it is improving public transportation contribute the greatest benefit for citizens.

It is so argued that government should enhance internet in rural area, because internet can let people know the information or learn knowledge around the world, and this is the way for them to get out of poor. Supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, those people in rural area may not have money to buy electronic devices. Internet will be totally useless for them. For example, in the countryside of India, most of the people are still using traditional phone which cannot connect to internet. By contrast, if government build railway in those area, people can easily go to city with only few cost. Beside, they can find some high pay jobs or educated in city. This is the only way for them to become wealthy.

Supporters of spending money on internet may still argue that improving internet is much cheaper. The real picture, however, is that the investment of building railway is worth it. If government give an easy way for people to go to those rural place. It may be lots of traveler who want to experience rural life or enjoy the beautiful scenery they cannot see in city. This will not only bring lots of jobs for hotel or tourist guide but also allow local government to collect more tax than the money they pay for public transportation.

Lastly, most of the large city today has faced lots of questions. Building public transportation in city can reduce Co2 emission, reducing traffic jam, allowing parking lot left. Moreover, Once people can go to work without driving themselves, due to the convenient metro. People can reduce enormous payment for buying or repairing a car. Those advantages will not happen by improving internet.

So beneficial is building public transportation that it must be taken into more serious consideration. It is this choice allow people going to city, developing rural area, and solving the problem in city.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-21 Take 70 view
2023-04-08 younessam 70 view
2023-03-13 Mohf89 70 view
2023-03-13 saharmnd 76 view
2023-03-13 saharmnd 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Kawa :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...ontrast, if government build railway in those area, people can easily go to city with only...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cost seems to be countable; consider using: 'few costs'.
Suggestion: few costs
... people can easily go to city with only few cost. Beside, they can find some high pay jo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not happen by improving internet. So beneficial is building public transpo...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, still, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68290302788 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543661971831 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.624550143 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5238095238 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222250482919 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681689636946 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692349834629 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135833501084 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688229315902 0.0645574589148 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.