Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Students at school often split into two viewpoints: to learn the humanities such as history and literature or to learn natural sciences such as mathematics, chemistry, and physics. Actually, this discussion is just like the discussion about whether a person is more inclined to the left-hemisphere or right-hemisphere. This essay will include two paragraphs which represent the benefits of science and mathematics, history and literature.
First of all, science and mathematics are the fundamental basements of world’s development. Theories and laws, which students learn at school, can be applied in the real world. Furthermore, scientists use these basic rules to create great inventions as well as figure out more developmental theories. For example, a popular theory that every student should know called Pythagoras theory in maths has played a vital role in daily life; my teacher even used this law to find the most time-saving direction when she was in traffic.
Secondly, students cannot ignore the importance of history and literature now that they provide a clear lesson, especially research assessment and critical thinking. When students approach history, it is inevitable that they will confront numbers and data as well as events. Those contexts, with the help of their teacher, abet learners to know how to “treat” the database and analyze its result. Furthermore, literature upgrade ascertainers’ critical thinking while learning well-known novels and poets. Students are required to say what they think and their own lessons after analyzing a poet, for example.
In conclusion, science, mathematics, history, and literature are equal crucial for students since they support different facets of life: science and mathematics is the foundation of the world’s development, history and literature bring back essential skills namely research assessment and critical thinking.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | KEVA | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | KEVA | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | huy04 | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | Naomi_manager | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | Naomi_manager | 76 | view |
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 78
- In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight How far do you agree with either of these views 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Subjects such as art music and drama should be a part of every child s basic education 90
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 80
- The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...earch assessment and critical thinking.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69824561404 4.8611393121 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06245646196 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628070175439 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5883383628 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.45110844103 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190855872058 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608915532334 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393601297037 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11553995971 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313392521944 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 10.9000537634 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.