Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As we are now in the fast lane of technology improvement, internet development enables us to contact with each other conveniently, and additionally, public transportation makes it possible for us to travel to anywhere, which have greatly enhanced the connection of people. In the meantime, however, government focus and spending are limited, which prompts us to have a focus within these two directions. In my opinion, public transportation needs more attention and support from the government.
Since we are now in the era of internet, internet access is one of the basic necessities for further development. With the help of improving internet access, people can easily get in touch and exchange their ideas and thoughts. while internet access can truly bring convenience in communication, traditional techniques like telephones and text messages can still meet the demands of most people, and the price for internet access is out of reach for a large amount, making the range of people who can enjoy the benefit of improving internet access become limited. In comparison, public transportation can provide benefits for the economics as well as a large range of people, making it a great decision to get more support from the government.
Firstly, public transportation can lift the employment rate as well as the business development, beneficial to the future development of a country. As more and more money poured into the infrastructure industry, it will generate thousands of jobs compared to the internet industry, while more and more less educated people can get employed to improve their life standards. As the data in the national bureau of statistics in the first quarter of 2018 shows, construction sites hold 15% of the jobs in the total market, much more than the 3.6% in the internet industry. Moreover, the increasing needs of construction machines as well as vehicles will boost the manufacturing business, which will benefit the economy in the long term, thus making the financial investment from government be noteworthy and could be generated back very fast.
In addition, public transportation improvement can be beneficial to a wide range of people, compared to the high access hurdle in internet. For school students, since most schools still require students to get to school and study together with classmates, enhancement in transportation would provide convenience and shorten the wasted time on traffic, which may save more time for students and in turn improves their academic performance. As an experiment conducted by a well-known psychological professor in Peking University, the time input and the mental satisfaction rate are highly connected with the overall academic output, while elimination of traffic jams would pose a significant positive effect on scores. what's more, workers and white-collars can enjoy the benefit of public transportation improvement as well, as the improvement will reduce the time of traffic and could enable the workers to live farther than before, reducing the life expense of those people. The decrement in traffic associated expense would lead to higher satisfaction of life, pushing them to work harder and happier, which could not be gained from the improvement of internet access.
From what we have discussed, public transportation would generate benefit to not only the associated industry chain, but wider range of people as well. As a result, more money should be invested in improving public transportation, and it would provide larger and more enduring benefits for the whole society.
- The government should spend their money on arts rather than on sports. 73
- The government should spend their money on arts rather than on sports. 73
- The government should spend their money on arts rather than on sports. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...internet, internet access is one of the basic necessities for further development. With the help ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... and exchange their ideas and thoughts. while internet access can truly bring conveni...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...o the internet industry, while more and more less educated people can get employed to imp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 718, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whats
... significant positive effect on scores. whats more, workers and white-collars can enj...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 718, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... significant positive effect on scores. whats more, workers and white-collars can enj...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 39.0 8.0752688172 483% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3012.0 1977.66487455 152% => OK
No of words: 563.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34991119005 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04614854805 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479573712256 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 940.5 618.680645161 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.0353111635 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.333333333 100.406767564 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2777777778 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25455873163 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915560670345 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518017445965 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149582997605 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316049760143 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 11.7677419355 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.1575268817 163% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.