Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends.
Throughout history, human beings have perpetually emigrated because of various reasons. In this regard, sporadically, they have lost their friend, homes, and even their job. The controversial question which always caused heated debates is whether it worth moving to a new city or country while we probably lose our friend or not. Some people possess the conviction that friends are like family, and we should not miss them; humans had better be sedentary in order to keep their friends. I, nonetheless, hold an alternative perspective and allege that move to another city does not necessarily lead to separation. Further discussion on this topic can be boiled down to a couple of upcoming reasons below.
The first momentous reason that bears in mind is that not only in the modern sophisticated era, does emigration give rise to loss of friends, but it also broadens the circle of our friends as well. As a matter of fact, as technology evolves and develops the way of communication_ like using video calls and..._ Friends will have kept their relationships. Moreover, the one who emigrated can invite them to the new city and country, whereby it would reinforce the sense of friendship. It should take into account that it is feasible to make new friends and get familiar with new persons who, spottily, are better than old friends. Consequently, not only can migration enhance our relationship as the Persian proverb mention, "Absence makes the heart grow fonder,"; but also, it is supposed to increase the number of our friends. To shed light on this issue, take a personal experience as a compelling example; back in high school I had to move to another city because of my father's job; I was upset since I have thought that I am going to lose my friend and become alone; but, no sooner had I arrived there than I found new loyal friends.
The second exquisite point that deserves some words here is that people usually move to the other city or country for a couple of fruitful purposes. In fact, they are not aimless; either are they obliged because of political or economic reasons, or they are looking for lucrative positions, jobs, or education. As a result, to emancipate some predicaments or achieve precious life situations, we should bear some dilemmas like being far from our home town, friends, and even our family. For instance, most of my friends have had to apply to another country to fulfill their pedagogical targets. Had they stay in our country, they would not have accomplished their dreams, although they would be near to their friends and family today, which would not make sense of deep contentment.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that moves to other cities, on one hand, provide us with a better opportunity to prosper and even enlarge the domain of our friends. On the other hand, it is plausible to keep or old friendships faithfully. Similarly, the more indispensable to migrate, the fewer sides' effects like distance from our friend comes to mind. Statistical research has demonstrated that, in the modern era, approximately ten percent of people all over the world will have to change their city or country to attain a better life condition.
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 73
- At one high school more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments For example many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments The school is considering making a change to 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good idea to move to a new city or a new country because you will lose old friends 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has greater influence on people s lives than television has 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 609, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'staid', 'stayed'.
Suggestion: staid; stayed
...ill their pedagogical targets. Had they stay in our country, they would not have acc...
^^^^
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...not make sense of deep contentment. to wrap it up, all the aforementioned reas...
^^
Line 6, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith better opportunity to prosperous and even enlarge the domain of our friends, ...
^^
Line 6, column 325, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun sides is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the more indispensable to migrate, the less sides’ effect like distance from our fr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, second, similarly, so, well, while, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2671.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88299817185 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69519193573 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522851919561 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 828.9 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1438108788 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.55 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.35 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193426392493 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612373674376 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053798422122 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124781080736 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501389583331 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.