Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer.
Simply Many countries believe advancement in successful space exploration is one of their big achievement. In the past, many astronauts has successfully landed in the moon and other planets. Similarly, scientists constantly have been attempting to launch their rocket on the new planet for a long time in order to know about the place. Since space exploration seemingly looks as redundant in the eye of the common people, however, its information has been crucial for long time for the human's benefit. Personally, I consent that the government should give funds for the space program and the reasons for my point are cogently expressed below.
To begin, space travel can be immensely useful to develop the technology which is directly applicable in our daily life. Many space expedition has been successful to generate information regarding planet revolution, magnetic field, satellite information and relative distance between the planet and earth. Applying this information, many scientific technologies like remote sensing, GIS, and telecommunication are possible to operate nowadays. Since, universe is full of mistery and any information outside earth can be valuable for humankind, investing in the space programs is beneficial.
Besides, providing a technological blueprint, a space program can be paramount to keep us safe from the imminent danger. When the earth is revolving around its path, many heavenly bodies are also present there. In some cases, there might be collision of these particles with the earth or broken particle may fall upon on the earth if other particle collide. On looking constantly and study about it, a space station can generate information about the possilbe hazard and help us to prepare about it. Though we are minuscule in the size and unable to change the event, still become safe by evacuating the site of action.
In conclusion, I reiterate my point that funding for space exploration is not the waste as it is highly applicable in the technological innovation and also capable of detect the pitfall in the space.
- Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone 60
- TPO 16 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 70
- It is easy for family member in present than past 70
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives Do you agree or disagree 76
- Any field is a combination of leader and follower. They are the functional elements of any human social system. On any filed leader has the prime importance as he should have capacity to assemble a followers to shape of any desired results in a process. 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, look, may, regarding, similarly, so, still, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2987804878 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92354363343 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594512195122 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7017190977 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.866666667 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198556641625 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665446995053 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686310780923 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137659936622 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677131892821 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.