Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today hectic life, people are busy with a rich diversity of responsibilities and tasks, and thus collaboration among individuals is critical important in accomplishing their affairs because they can help one another and perform tasks in a shorter time. Having a good leadership in a group so as to manage affairs and assign each member's duty is necessary in being successful. In this line of thought, several people believe that leadership ability comes naturally, while many others disagree with this notion, holding the view that this characteristic can be learnt by ones during their lives. I strongly concur with the latter group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, a good leader needs to have a strong communication skill, which is gained through interaction with people in real life, and it does not an in-born quality. To be more specific, each group activity requires having a high level of healthy relationships and collaboration among team members. This can be achieved if the leader of the group possesses a high level of communication skills since in this way, he can create healthy and effective relationships among group members and strengthen their cooperation. Under these circumstances, they will be more likely to easily achieve their goals. For the sake of having a marked degree of communication skill, the leader of the group should interact with a large number of people in his life, and these interactions improve his experiences in social interaction and boost his skill in making strong, effective relationships with others. It is obvious that this good feature cannot be notched up without gaining experience in real life, and it does not come naturally in any individual.
Secondly, an effective leader should be well-educated and be experienced in a field of study in order to guide members rightly and appropriately, which is obtained by studying and learning in real life. Nowadays, matters are more complex and sophisticated than they were in the past, requiring people to be knowledgeable enough in their areas of study so as to be helpful for their teams. Indeed, if a leader has lack of sufficient knowledge and is not well-educated, he will not be able to help their team members appropriately and guide them to the right direction, or propose and come up with innovative ideas while being faced with crisis and arduous situations. Thus, he needs to be taught and educated in schools or university, for example, and become a well-equipped in one area of knowledge and effective in helping his group members.
To conclude, leadership is not an innate characteristic, but rather a quality that is learned in real life, and it does not come naturally in a person. Not only a leader should learn and gain communication skill through interacting with people to improve this quality and be helpful for teamwork activities, but he also needs to be educated and well-equipped in an area in order to help his team in solving sophisticated problems and dealing with any obstacles.
- TPO47 task1 3
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement At universities and colleges sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support 73
- tpo 40 task2 3
- tpo26 3
- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...me. Having a good leadership in a group so as to manage affairs and assign each members ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...so as to manage affairs and assign each members duty is necessary in being successful. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 712, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eader of the group should interact with a large number of people in his life, and these interacti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...edgeable enough in their areas of study so as to be helpful for their teams. Indeed, if ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 13.8261648746 224% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 52.1666666667 155% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 507.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10650887574 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0366632281 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467455621302 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 800.1 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4494714874 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.8125 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6875 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185690945266 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07134443268 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352862967851 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130286518193 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212178667481 0.0645574589148 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.