Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Many schools for young children (ages 5-11) require students to work together in small groups instead of working alone for many of their activities.
Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
The question is whether schools should require young children to work in small groups instead of acting alone or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to affirm that being in a group will provide a huge number of merits for the young in ages 5-11. I feel this way for some reason, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my vantage point:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that children can be confused in confronting with school ambient, since they have to leave their play world and enter to an educational atmosphere. In first glance, the young may find a sense of stress, annoying and numb; hence, such a condition would affect their performance. Yet, one should not forget that being in small groups is able to assist children to improve their abilities. For instance, it may be tedious for a child to solve a math question; however, through collaboration and consulting with other students, this mentioned monotonous circumstance will become a competitive and exiting situation. In other word, every child will attempt to tender a new solution, therefore, a group can conclude quickly about assignments compared with a solitary child. In short, several thoughts will act better than one.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact that groups play a crucial role in forming children's personality. Needless to say that when the young start school, they usually wrestle with a wide range of pressures due to being far away their family; consequently, such the pressures can jeopardize improving their character. To elucidate, take my own brother's experience. Since he was a sensitive person and dependent to my mother, so going to school and being alone there, could harm his social behavior. While if his school had provided a law for working in the groups, he would have communicated with other students for optimizing their relationships. Briefly, a group can help students to make new friendships and boost their self-esteem. It goes without saying that a person with high self-confidence is able to guarantee their future.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that I strongly believe that groups will cause the young foster a great number of advantages in themselves such as making new friends and improving social relationships, learning teamwork and collaborating with others and list goes on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-05 | peerless alex | 43 | view |
- tpo13 85
- Tpo6 3
- do you agree or disagree? the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. 85
- tpo32 88
- the state should set fines or penalties for companies which produce pollution or it should find other ways to deal with the pollution problem. which one is better? 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in short, such as, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08436724566 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77305693678 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590570719603 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.5841089757 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0625 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1875 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.45110844103 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268082778737 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891109121801 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728309752342 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164512706196 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857010815131 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.