Throughout the history, the power of money has played an essential role in all the societies.in all situations, the pivotal question that arises regarding to this point is that whether affluent people should take part in charity donates as much as they can or not.as we all know, people as the members of an allied community have not equal portion of money. and this inequality has aroused heated debates among sociologist and economists. While some are claiming that rich people should take away from the social issues and contributes in limited charitable activities, others have the exact opposite viewpoints and respecting to philanthropy states that all people have a kind of responsibility to other humans. although some counterexamples might exist, I am of the opinion that the latter idea is a mature piece of criticism for an organized society. I strongly disagree with this idea for two main reasons which I address them below.
First, it is established beyond doubt that since the money defined the concept of modern society came to being, paying tax from rich people in order to improve the economic structure of the societies has seemed increasingly in need. If the manufacturers pay their taxes to the governments, the received money can allocate for eradication poverty. thus, we have not need to direct financial ads of riches. India is a great example of my claim. There are many riches who are avoiding to pay their taxes. However the riches help to poor people in there, this country has the most number of poor people.
Secondly, the scientists put other compelling reason to grab the academicians attention. since all satisfactory reason should include some benefits, there are many good points crafting their reason. the power of money can build a strong economy in which people who are in need can moving forward to better living situations. if there are not any big company to hire these people, the disorganized economic situation results in forcing them to live on charity. the result of a conducted survey by a university has proved the claim and stated that the people who are creative and try to lead people to make their own job have more beneficial effects on society growth in the long run.
The fact is, contributing to charitable donates by rich people deserves special mentions and owing to aforementioned describes, we may draw a conclusion that paying money to charities directly seems not a good idea. This issue requires Further studies to peel away from traditional benefit statements in order to get a core answer with which provides conclusive results unanimously accepted by both parties
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The more money people have, the more they should contribute to charity. 86
- Which one of these abilities do you think is the most important for a high school teacher teaching students ages 15 18 to have the ability to give students advice to plan for their future the ability to find which students need help and provide them with 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...munity have not equal portion of money. and this inequality has aroused heated deba...
^^^
Line 1, column 714, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...kind of responsibility to other humans. although some counterexamples might exist, I am ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...y can allocate for eradication poverty. thus, we have not need to direct financial a...
^^^^
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
... eradication poverty. thus, we have not need to direct financial ads of riches. Indi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 502, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...es who are avoiding to pay their taxes. However the riches help to poor people in there...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'academicians'' or 'academician's'?
Suggestion: academicians'; academician's
...put other compelling reason to grab the academicians attention. since all satisfactory reaso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...son to grab the academicians attention. since all satisfactory reason should include ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...many good points crafting their reason. the power of money can build a strong econo...
^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ng forward to better living situations. if there are not any big company to hire t...
^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...lts in forcing them to live on charity. the result of a conducted survey by a unive...
^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nclusive results unanimously accepted by both parties
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03203661327 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7371156962 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576659038902 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4355854152 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.166666667 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2777777778 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211270952934 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489881340788 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443492886478 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113386127546 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379753232842 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.002688172 195% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.