Without a shadow of a doubt, preserving the environment plays a pivotal role in human lives. An unanswered question in this area is whether reducing the contamination of the environment would be a promising approach toward enhancing people's health. As far as I am concerned, I believe that allocating budgets to keep the environment clean and enacting policies forbidding polluting activities would be helpful to protect people against various illnesses. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that a clean environment provides people with opportunities to breathe clean air. These days, many big cities and urban areas are polluted by factories. These manufacturers emit a significant amount of detrimental particles into the air. These harmful substances spread through cities and groundwater. As a result, people are imposed to consume contaminated water and breathe a lot of toxic chemical substances every day. There is no question that if people are not deprived of a clean environment, they are less likely to suffer chronic diseases. For example, had my cushion not lived in a crowded and polluted city, he would not spend excessive money on his treatments.
Another reason to be mentioned is that a clean environment prevents people from experiencing mental diseases. To be more specific, currently, natural resources like forests and rivers will be destroyed and damaged by industries. For example, some companies discard their rubbish and contaminated material into waterways. The pronounced effect of their activities is that many trees and animals will become extinct soon. The governments should monitor these companies, and their polluting activities should be restricted. It is indispensable for humans to relax out of cities frequently. When people spend their time in nature, they relieve their stresses and anxieties.
Reflecting upon all the reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that societies and governments should spare no effort to keep the environment clean because individuals’ mental and physical health drastically depends on living in a clean environment.
- Some young people have free time in the evenings after school or on days off from school Which of the following activities would be most beneficial for young people ages 14 18 to do in their spare time Why Gaining practical work experience either at a par 80
- If you need to take a course which professor s course would you like to take a professor who was voted the most popular a professor who has just won an award for an outstanding research 83
- Imagine that you plan to donate money to charity to help people in need If you could give money to only one type of charitable organization which one of the following would you choose and why An organization that provides food and housing to people in nee 88
- Which one do you think is the most important factor for a student to succeed at college or university Tutors in university The encouragement from family and friends High quality education from high school 76
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of detrimental particles into the air. These harmful substances spread through citie...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56342182891 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08596589298 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59587020649 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9303131635 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2631578947 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.05263157895 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162593627031 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447426960542 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530861027933 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102893703031 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333115563132 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.