Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television programs should present stories in which good people are rewarded and bad people are punished.
Without a shadow of doubt, movies’ stories can have a great effect on every individual’s mood who watches them. Some people are proponents of the claim that it is better that movies present their stories in a way, in which viewers would not be able to predict if the good people are going to be rewarded or not and have a sense of suspension in them; however, others hold the opposite perspective and believe that solely good people should get rewarded at the end of the movie. The idea to which I subscribe is the latter one. My viewpoint is based on quite a few reasons, two compelling ones of which have been elaborated upon hereunder.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that having good people rewarded in movies can be constructive for children. Children at a younger age are sensitive and they try to learn different things and even imitate the valued behaviors. Moreover, the more children see a movie character is getting praised because of his right doings, the more they would will to imitate the same values of the hero of the movie. A case in point is my younger brother who was a great fan of Captain America. After he watched his favorite hero’s movie, he was really impressed by his heroism, as a consequence, he tried to imitate him by always helping others with whatever he could.
The second noteworthy reason is that seeing good people prevailing over the challenges can make us feel better about our life. Nowadays, we are exhausted, for we are dealing with our hectic lives and most of the time we are overwhelmed with problems we are facing. Hence, we need to recover not only physically, but also mentally as well and watching this sort of movies can help us to recover in the appropriate manner. My own experience is a good example of this matter. There was a time in my life, in which I had to cope with lots of issues. I was studying really hard and at the same time, I was working at a full-time job, for I needed money to pay for my studies. I remember that I was frustrated and one day I watched an inspiring movie called The pursuit of happiness. It made me feel better, as I saw the character rewarded for his hard work at the end of the movie.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that it is better for movies to have good people get rewarded at the end of the story as it is constructive for children and it can recover adults mentally and make them feel better in their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | shahabaddin_solaimanian | 78 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great amount of traffic Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 78
- Question : Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- birds and ways to prevent them from flying into the buildings 73
- the evidence of the organic material in the fossil of the T-rex 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, well, in short, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67627494457 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8113830426 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532150776053 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.93391521 48.9658058833 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.6 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0666666667 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197117170375 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620298292083 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710877341981 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133576323818 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669229938102 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.