Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Development of technology has led to an increase in the number of available sources of entertainment one of which is television. While a number of people assume that the television has more negative impacts than positive effects on young people’s behavior, I hold a different view, believing that its merits outweigh its drawbacks. This essay will explore a couple of reasons for my perspective in the following paragraphs.
First of all, due to the fact that programs and movies are under the surveillance of the government, they would follow several strict regulations in the sense of their content. Thus, the movies and programs aired on the television contain fewer anti-value and harsh scenes and a larger quantity of practical and valuable information. For instance, there are a proportion of programs including documentaries that have been devised to instruct people a vast array of contrasting human qualities and features of the surrounding environment. Therefore, young adults are provided with a considerable amount of beneficial information that they can exploit them in their daily life. For example, I am looking forward to watching an extremely noteworthy documentary on Mondays on television. This is a program in which the announcer interviews various people who have committed the crime and challenges them with diverse questions. While watching the program, I try to respond to the questions from my point of view to comprehend the flaws that I own in my personality, which could drive me towards a considerably incorrect way. Hence, challenging myself during the time I take to watch this program, I could gain a more mature outlook towards my life.
Secondly, the majority of movies demonstrated on television entail a valuable storyline following a particular virtue to display. To put it in other words, movies usually are about a desired kind of morality that is in the absence or close to the breakdown in the current conditions of the society. Therefore, should adolescents take time and watch them, they will realize that they ought to pay more attention to that specific virtue and try to protect it. For example, the growing number of divorces ensued by cheating in my country, pushed the directors and authors to make movies to value the loyalty and remind people of the degradation and approaching complete loss of this special ethic. Therefore, being provided with a wide variety of high-level movies conveying remarkable human virtues, youngsters are able to understand them and the results of putting them aside on their personal lives and even communities.
On the whole, taking all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I cling to this view that television is more likely to have a constructive influence on youngsters rather than negative effects. Not only are there a handful of substantially profitable programs including documentaries, but there also are movies designed to convey pieces of certain virtues to the youth.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-12 | SHARMIN AKTAR | 76 | view |
- Agree or disagree? The rules that society today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO48 85
- TPO54 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, kind of, first of all, in other words, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25732217573 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01156204668 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543933054393 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.5918026755 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.611111111 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20320306405 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560049294551 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534690315958 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128999147342 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387077578993 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.