Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Are today's people more generous than those who lived in the past? The answer to this question has raised a lot of debate among people. Some people may hold the viewpoint that nowadays because of the fast pace and also the complexity of people's lives, they would rather develop a kind of lifestyle that is rooted in individualism. However, other people may take the opposite opinion and believe that modern-day people are more cognizant of the severe quality of life in other areas. Thus, they are more eager to help those people who are in urgent need of food and clothing. I personally incline towards the latter opinion. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through some notable reasons.
My first reason and maybe the most important one is that because of the development of social media and the incredible improvement in the information transfer speed, people nowadays have more knowledge about other parts of their country and the world. In the past, people exclusively donated money and goods to those in their vicinity. Nevertheless, in the modern era, people are more likely to know about extreme disasters occurring to people who live thousands of kilometers far away, and this feature of modern life have made people closer in one sense. For instance, when an earthquake happens in a corner of the world, as soon as its news spreads, people from all over the world will send a large variety of food and other primary goods to those areas.
My second reason is that transferring goods have been also facilitated nowadays. Unlike the past when people had to use livestock to carry a limited quantity of merchandise, people today are able to transfer a large variety of goods to the opposite side of the world at an unbelievable speed. Fast means of transportation help us a lot to deliver items to areas in distress while keeping them fresh and intact. The world seems like a small village today, and distances have vanished after the fast development of technology.
Lastly, I think a strong feeling of altruism has been spread among people nowadays. We all see parents making great attempts to inculcate a sense of humanism into their children. Because of the relative prosperity of people, they are more likely to develop preoccupations with issues more than just what relates to themselves. From my point of view, human beings are going to make huge progress in many aspects. Not only has modern life given people technological advances, but also it offers them a great opportunity to pay particular attention to issues that were considered senseless before since people were busy with meeting their basic needs all the time, having no time and enthusiasm to spend thinking about other people's difficulties.
In summary, based on the aforementioned arguments, I firmly believe that nowadays people are more eager to help other people they don't know compared to the past. Some reasons, like the fast speed of information transfer, the development of swift means of transportation, and the spread of a sense of altruism among people, are mentioned above. However, that was like a story in a nutshell. Actually, there are some other ideas and reasons challenging this claim, which are not mentioned above. All in all, I firmly believe that people today help other people more often than in the past.
- Should one judge a person by external appearances 73
- Who would you choose to build a statue in your country 73
- Highways or public transportation 90
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfal 90
- A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx preserved in volcanic ash was discovered in Liaoning China in 1996 Interestingly the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones Some paleontologists interpret the lines as 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...re more eager to help other people they dont know compared to the past. Some reasons...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in summary, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 98.0 52.1666666667 188% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95365418895 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64463599306 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499108734403 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 892.8 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5171921182 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.16 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.44 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34911028099 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983325270383 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918082328222 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207345548363 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631241516359 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.