Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
While some people think that people become more selfish due to overflowing self-centered individualism, others are skeptical of this view and assert that people in modern days are fonder of helping others. After taking into account both arguments, the latter opinion seems more reasonable. There are two reasons to validate this.
To begin with, with the widespread use of the Social Network System, people are more willing to help others. Since SNS is a tool that spreads information by leaps and bounds, people receive news every minute and they are enthusiastic over virtue. A person who performs good deeds will be soon praised on the internet as a hero and be apotheosized. Everyone loves heroes. Therefore, in order to be praised by others and become famous, whether their intention is right or wrong, people in these days try to help others publicly. For instance, there was a famous Instagram Reels challenge. In order to participate in the challenge, people need to donate their money and validate their actions through Instagram. The challenge was really heated and thousands of people posted their donation certificates on the SNS. Although some might say it is a mere showing-off or they are hypocrites, the unchangeable fact is the total charity participation rate has been increased rapidly.
Furthermore, the way to help others become more convenient. With the incessant development of technologies, people do not need to help others manually or in person. For example, when I was an elementary student, our school operated an annual donation program. In order to participate in it, students needed to fill the piggy bank given by their homeroom teacher or to bring some outdated clothing, un-read books, or food to school. Not surprisingly, the participation rate was always low. Most of the students just forgot to bring those things. However, things got changed now. I am a sophomore now and used to using time tracker application on my smartphone. One day, an alarm popped up on screen and said “Congratulation! You donated $20 to children living in the third-world!” I was surprised because I never even tried to participate in any charity program ever since my childhood. I logged on to the application I finally knew that this app saves some points when I use it and it automatically donates it to others. Like my experience, with the advance of technology, people in modern days do not need to pay attention to help others. Unwittingly we are performing charity and technologies carry out the complicated process.
- Caring for a pet is the best way for a child to learn responsibility 3
- Topic Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for young people to select a job in the same field as their parents than to choose a different career for themselves 80
- Caring for a pet is the best way for a child to learn responsibility 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support y 86
- Topic People in the past ate better food for their health than they do nowadays 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, really, so, therefore, third, thus, while, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2127.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08851674641 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97959088032 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586124401914 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.82701931 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.625 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245029210566 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619353631791 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658063063059 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170284567181 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302012496335 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.