Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Human society is like a huge team. All the teammates have to help each other for having a more suitable life. Some people are richer than others, which means they can afford the financial aspects of their lives better. But they should not forget to help other members of the community who do not have enough money to have a minimum quality of living. I believe these kinds of charity activities are happening more than in past years, and I have some reasons to support my point of view.
To begin with, the alteration of the modern era leads us to understand others’ feelings better than before. In the past, people had no idea of what was happening outside of their city or village. But with the progress of technology, social network, and global news gives us an up-to-date and clear image of other weak people living far from our homes. These technological revolutions caused more sense of sympathy in people's hearts. Now we are here where everyone is aware of bad news and want to help others who spend difficult days because of natural disasters, wars, and so on.
Furthermore, the new generation does not have any interest to follow the traditional ways, and one of the results of these cultural differences is helping others more. Many years before, people used to pay attention only to themselves and their family and close friends. They did not find it important to help others, because they had to struggle to only feed their own family. Having hard days makes them selfish, and even after those days passed they did not leave their old habits. But things have changed and despite old ones, the younger people do not see any reason to not help other poor people.
To wrap it up, I extremely believe that people are helping poor citizens more than ever. Not only are cultural enhancements happening more and more, but also people’s sympathy can be felt more due to technology. These charity deeds must be continued until no one, not a single person, has a problem with having food or proper clothes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Mobile phones have given people more freedom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more interested in politics now than they were in the past 70
- As a new teaching method professors record a video lecture in advance for students to learn and class time is used to answer questions and have discussions Do you think this is an effective way and why 80
- tpo 30 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71104815864 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35572806034 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597733711048 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8904875685 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3888888889 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290600992236 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892772729608 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440061257418 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179227173247 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00567915586537 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.