Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
One of the characteristics of successful leaders is the sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes.
As the most influential person in any group and possessing of a degree of control unobtainable by other members, leaders are always under scrutiny with regard to their attributes, traits and methods of tackling hurdles thrown their way in achieving a common objective together with their subordinates. One such characteristic, which is the main point of contention in this essay, is the capacity for criticism and being able to build upon one’s shortcomings. In my opinion, this very ability is, definitively, the most essential adjective for a leader to have.
The criteria with which leaders are chosen, naturally contain flexibility on a professional level due to the fact that the head of a group is always required to consistently revise the work accomplished individually and collectively in order to make sure that the end result is of the utmost quality. Take for example a stubborn manager at a forensics laboratory, who will simply not accept any and all complaints thrown his/her way regarding the handling of submitted evidence. Containment hazards due to this stubbornness may result in tampering of sensitive material crucial in solving a case, and thus something as easy as admitting violations of basic sanitary and safety procedures results in sabotage of the whole group. Indeed, an overly conservative leader can bring down everyone alongside the standard for their goal.
Secondly, accepting one’s mistakes, regardless of their position in a group’s hierarchy, has led to improvements of the results attained by said person. In other words, not only is this characteristic required so as to make sure a blunder or worse, potential disaster is avoided, it is also essential in making sure the end result reach the peaks of standard set by those who will judge the work. Two head mechanics in a factory might be able to assemble the same car but the one who used his/her team’s constructive criticism will have achieved a higher quality end product in the form of a vehicle that is well-rounded in all aspects resulting from different members weighing in and helping the manager realize their mistake as well as the manager being accepting of this critique. Inevitably, this aspect of a leader results in improvement for every individual for which they have a responsibility.
In conclusion, this characteristic is one of the first points we here from history’s greatest leaders; all unique visionaries have had this aspect engraved in their personality. Therefore, to understand how important this trait is, we need only look at history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | AJ720 | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | porteghale Abiasli | 76 | view |
- It is very important for students to learn as much as possible before their graduation from university For this reason many schools require students to attend all of their classes in person in order to achieve a passing grade Do you agree or disagree with 85
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 90
- Some students prefer to study and do homework alone Others prefer to study and work on class assignments with a group of fellow students Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage The yellow crazy ant is one of the world s most destructive invasive species species that are not native to an area bu 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there s no need for the government to help them 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ot only is this characteristic required so as to make sure a blunder or worse, potential...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20722891566 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05720748998 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573493975904 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.6841927982 48.9658058833 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.230769231 100.406767564 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9230769231 20.6045352989 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9230769231 5.45110844103 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182470119175 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685133169328 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402845640969 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113009483948 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428340140062 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 11.7677419355 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.