Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: One quality that a successful leader must have is to make decisions quickly; when a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people he leads.
In the modern era, due to the complexities of the modern societies, decision making plays a crucial role in every aspect of people lives. In this regard, it is critically important for people to choose the best way of decision making, and leaders are not the exception to this rule. Some people possess the conviction that successful leaders are one who make decision instantly. Nevertheless, others may hold other perspective. I contend that making decision fast should not be consider as a significant feature of successful leaders. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
First and foremost, decision making is a process in which people with different knowledge should express their opinion, which means it takes time to consult with many people with different expertise. There is widely held belief that the more people ask other’s opinions about a problem, the more the decision they make about that problem will be practical. It goes without saying that if leaders don’t consult with other knowledgeable people, they cannot make the best decision, and their decision will have dire consequences for organizations. My own experience is a case in point. Approximately five years ago, I worked in a famous company in my country. The leader of the mentioned company always made decision by himself, so it was able to do that fast. As time elapsed, his decisions turned out to be so ineffective that the company encounter a lot of hurdles. Had he not made decisions instantly and without asking other’s opinions, the company would not have faced such issues.
The second noteworthy reason to be mentioned is that leaders should analyze all positive and negative aspects of their decisions so that they can detect all weaknesses and strengths of their plans. There is no denying the fact that if they don’t consider all facets of their decision, it might lead to huge challenges, so chaos ensues. It is axiomatic that assessing all aspects of a decision take time. In the research conducted in my country in 2020, factors that affected making best decision that gave rise to a prosperity of organizations were examined. The results revealed that one of the most important factors were to appraise all ins and pros of decisions before finalize them. Leaders who considered different facets of a problem before making decision regarding that made more effective and useful decision and their organization reached their goals of being successful in the long run. These company did not face difficulties most of the time, nor did they waste their resources in view of bad decisions.
In short, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that fast decision-making should not be considered as a good characteristic of leaders. Not only does it causes leader not to consult with experts, but also it prevents them from analyzing different side of their decisions, both of which bring about huge costs for companies in the long term. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are some other reasons and examples which are not mentioned above. Finally, it is suggested that leaders spend enough time analyzing various facets of problems before making decision about them, and want others to express their views about that.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Government instead of individuals should cover Internet fees 47
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on technology such as computers smart phones as well as video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should spend more money on improving facilities e g labs and general equipment than on hiring famous professors 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'making the best'.
Suggestion: making the best
... country in 2020, factors that affected making best decision that gave rise to a prosperity...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 899, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'These companies'?
Suggestion: This company; These companies
...ls of being successful in the long run. These company did not face difficulties most of the t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cause'?
Suggestion: cause
...acteristic of leaders. Not only does it causes leader not to consult with experts, but...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cause'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: cause
...acteristic of leaders. Not only does it causes leader not to consult with experts, but...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2787.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09506398537 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77573077642 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488117001828 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 865.8 618.680645161 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0586697645 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.48 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.88 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338809429495 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098437167893 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710578810052 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220013653837 0.150856017488 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591516851976 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.