Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: One quality that a
successful leader must have is to make decisions quickly; when a leader takes
too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people
he leads
Leading is often in conjunction with great decisions in crisis times. Some people believe that it’s unnecessary for a leader to make prompt decisions. They cite the current economic and environmental issues that are the consequences of leader’s quick determination. However, I firmly disagree with these people and believe that a leader’s choices must be as expeditiously as possible, so that people can put their trust in him. I will support my perspective with three reasons.
First of all, people would put their faith in a thoughtful chief, which could bring people’s support. As a result, he can implement his decisions easier and would get the best results. Here I depict one of my own experiences. Once I took a tour with a group of people in wild nature, unfortunately heavy rain ceased our journey which our exceedingly cautious leader made a swift verdict to change our route via a shortcut in order to find a good shelter and we all obeyed his firm decision, as a consequence we ultimately found a suitable spot as a shelter. If he had not made that quick and confidential decision, he would have had not our support. It is important for a dean not only to make a decision, but also be able to discriminate in crisis moments. Generally speaking, there is a key moment in every leader’s leading period to make beneficial decision, and the more people observe efficient choices, the more they put their faith in him.
Second of all, it is obvious that a precise and successful chief can save his own people by efficient decisions. There are many factors that can affect people’s viewpoint, but there the most crucial factor is people’s lives. For instance, during 2020 pandemic New Zealand was a successful country in controlling covid-19. Their leadership caused millions of people’s lives in New Zealand, which was the consequence of their expeditious decision in early days. Big achievements like saving people’s lives during crises can be obtained by an outstanding decision. In other words, people can be saved by their own leader or can be wasted by their decisions.
Last but not the least, it is noteworthy to mention that sometimes leader’s last-minte resolves can be ineffective due to his lack of leadership’s experience. Hence, people can observe failures of their leader’s decisions. These ineffective decisions can cost in economic downfall, natural disasters, and put worldwide health in danger. For exemplify, in a village near my city, there was a warning of an upcoming storm, but due to our leader’s wrong decision in order to not evacuating the village, many people died during that storm. It should be noted that, often these bad decisions lead to people’s disappointment in their leaders, which can lead to leader’s removal from power, where he should have never be put in the first place.
To conclude, the issue of that a successful leader’s quick decisions has a direct influence on people’s believes is complex. Some people think that leader’s decisions effectiveness is much more important in the first place, and it is not essential to be quick, and some others suggest quick decisions are crucial importance in critical moments.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can get as many benefits from organization or club activities as they can get from their academic studies 73
- TPO 30 ancient Greeks burning mirror 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparent cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Universities should spend more money on improving facilities e g labs and general equipment than on hiring famous professors 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 712, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... from power, where he should have never be put in the first place. To conclude, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, for instance, as a result, first of all, in other words, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2683.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 528.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08143939394 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93205246793 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488636363636 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9701389549 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.32 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.12 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322872828259 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958305569313 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525708163273 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205525722877 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573899493684 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.