Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
We live in a society that has the tendency for prejudice. While some people give create impressions of other’s looks, I believe that we should never judge a person by the external appearances. I feel this way for reasons that I will explore in the following essay.
To start with, looks can be deceiving. As such, you get wrong ideas about a person. The way you dress is what partly forms your appearance. Every individual has his own style, and preference for clothing. Therefore, we cannot judge others choices on that matter. For instance, if somebody is wearing their traditional clothes, and you are unaware of their cultural importance, you may be quick to judge that their outfit is inappropriate. As a result, based on your misconceptions, you will choose not to accompany yourself with that person that may have been a politician, or cultural leader of some sort. In other words,
Another reason to consider is that the more you judge others, the more you narrow your perspective. I have a similar, compelling experience of my own. When I was hired for the first time in an international business company, I was exposed to different cultures and types of persons. There was one particular man who never wore a suit, didn’t stand straight, or look at you in the eyes when you were conversing. These really irritated me. Consequently, I chose not to work closely with that employee. However, what I found out later was that that man had immigrated to the U.S., and had lost his properties due to some federal conflicts. However, he had been employed by the company I was working for, because of his impressive skills, and wide range of knowledge. The other workers chose to associate themselves with the person mentioned because he was open to discuss ideas, and plans. In conclusion, I almost lost an opportunity to expand my perspective, due to my incapability of tolerating others for the way they looked.
In brief words, people should stop judging others because of their external appearance, because they may be deceived, and have their mind narrowed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | Pakshid | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | Bijayani | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | honeylessbee | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-16 | Diella | 70 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Elena Cristina | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One should never judge a person by external appearances. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following essay. To start with, looks can be deceiving. A...
^^^
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral leader of some sort. In other words, Another reason to consider is that the m...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ating others for the way they looked. In brief words, people should stop judgi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in brief, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92045454545 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84916980804 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571022727273 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9677990419 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4761904762 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7619047619 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201242974283 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551215756289 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541508420976 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125115437136 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398244746698 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.