Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is beyond question that today’s people are bombarded with a great deal of information which news resources release. While some believe that people should acquire valid information from restricted sources to be well-informed, I am thoroughly convinced that pursuing various news resources can lead to a better understanding of information. In what follows, I will pinpoint two underlying reasons.
The first vital aspect to point out is that each news resource provides distinct information which is not found in others. Indeed, some information is not covered in special resources because of the lack of professional journalist or devoid of sufficient finances to write about every news. Accordingly, if ones pursue especific resources over the course of a day, they will miss some significant information. As a case in point, I used to check the price of house in my hometown through a news agency that was reliable for years. Consequently, I decided not to check other websites, which was greatly disadvantageous to me because they did not cover the whole hometown’s prices. In the end, I lost some remarkable houses which were fitted to my budget in places that news agency did not report. Had I gotten information from various sources, I would have bought an inexpensive home.
The second noteworthy reason I would like to mention is that some news resources disseminate false information to absorb more readers or audiences. Indeed, justifying news is hard to be obtained by following limited news sources. Conversely, Checking diverse of sources enables people to compare news to authenticate their sincerity. In addition, If people gain their information from different resources, News agencies will endevour hard to prevent from spreading false news because of the competition between them. My father’s experience is a compelling example of this matter. He used to follow news from a channel on television that was biased toward a party. The channel was not respecting the audiences by propagating wrong news in favor of the party’s policy. After a while, my father decided to get information from other channels, which was beneficial for him because he noticed that he could compare information to prevent misleading news.
To sum up, in the light of the stated reasons above, one can readily conclude that not only does following different news resources leads people to have access to complete information in each area, but also they are able to compare the information of each resource to obtain authenticated news.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | minammah | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-02 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-12 | nida fatima | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by societyin the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support youranswer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, conversely, first, if, second, so, then, well, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2136.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96838719985 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6794945016 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.421052632 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4736842105 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280099816897 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881538247881 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586146664561 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185036089244 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040460921155 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.