Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age.
Financial management of a person is susceptible to their spending money habits in his childhood. I believe this is an accurate idea, so parents should pay more attention to it. Reasons make me to decide this way consists of the fact that youngsters learn to have a salary and rising independent children.
A child should be familiar to have constant amount of money to spend. He tries to manage his spends and cut his redundant ones to not confront lacking of money by end of the month. It helps him to demand economically and not surpass his economical potent. For example, a child which has a 200 dollars per month tries to catch the school bus every morning, because missing that means an excessive spend over taking a taxi. To sum up, assigning a pocket money for children let them to manage it in the best way, so they can be more successful as a future member of a family to control expenses.
Independency is the biggest gift that is achieved by managing money as a child. Youngsters always depend on their parents for money to buy new stuffs. When parents allocate pocket money for them they recognize that they should not lean on their parents any more. It gives them a freedom which they can spend money over things that parents do not allow them, so not only does this notion help children to manage their pocket, but it also gives them a chance to save money for their guilty pleasures. Therefore, make a child be responsible for his expenses is a brilliant way to let him strengthen his economical management.
Youngsters learn spend correctly by let them control their own money. Autonomy is the key for children to be prosperous in adulthood. This achievement starts by allocate a pocket money for them, so they try to control and spend it in the way they want.
- Truth 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer. 73
- Altruism 78
- Some people think that parents should plan their children’s leisure time carefully. Other people believe those children should decide for themselves how to spend their free time, Which idea do you agree with?Give reasons for your choice. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pocket money'.
Suggestion: pocket money
...ver taking a taxi. To sum up, assigning a pocket money for children let them to manage it in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...brilliant way to let him strengthen his economical management. Youngsters learn spend c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to spend'
Suggestion: to spend
...nomical management. Youngsters learn spend correctly by let them control their own...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pocket money'.
Suggestion: pocket money
...od. This achievement starts by allocate a pocket money for them, so they try to control and sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63406940063 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54320115315 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514195583596 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6602603475 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8125 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167242401203 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675259460303 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472999254234 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117858724449 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271350834546 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.