Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations. Use specific reasons and examples to support your essay. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
Life has been made more comfortable and convenient. With the inventions of cars, airplanes, and computers to mention but a few, humans can travel around the world and carry out complex tasks easily and in a limited time. However, many are concerned that the way we live presently is sure to affect the next generations negatively. I totally agree. Our current way of life will impact negatively future generations because the energy emissions of these technological inventions are posing a great threat to us as it contributes largely to the depletion of the ozone layer.
Depletion of the ozone layer. A lot of modern technology we use today emits harmful gases that contribute largely to the depletion of the ozone layer. For example, emissions from cars, and airplanes and the burning of fossil fuels are greenhouse gases and too much of these greenhouse gases can cause Earth's atmosphere to trap more and more heat. As a result, the earth warms up and exposes us, humans, to a lot of harm which includes climate change. For this reason, I fear that our continued use of these technologies will further deplete the ozone layer, posing a great threat to future generations.
Health deterioration. To meet the demands of the ever-increasing population, scientists are now enhancing the foods we consume by genetically modifying these seeds or livestock so that there will be an increased output. The effect of continual consumption of such foods is that it poses a lot of threat to our health system and these health challenges are most times genetically transferred to our offspring. I, therefore, fear that if we continue this way, the generations to come will battle with a lot of uncommon health challenges.
In conclusion, while it is true that life has been made more comfortable and convenient with technological inventions, they also pose a threat to us and if we continue with this way of life, future generations are sure to be greatly affected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-30 | GRACE_047 | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Prazwal Neupane | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-19 | Pravin s. jadhav | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | Gurjot kaur bhatia | 76 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage The article talks about the early works of James MacNeil Whistler 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 81
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations Use specific reasons and examples to support your essay Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 70
- Jumping Young Salmon Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories presented in the reading passage 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9756097561 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92247516578 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9967283207 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161814582676 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510376055256 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538798867171 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105475672065 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336565009419 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.