Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is obvious that parents wish success to their children, and some of them truly participate in kids` education. However, I disagree with the statement that parents are the best teachers. There are a few reasons why I feel this way.
One of the reasons is that parents are to busy to educate children. Nowadays, in time of fast developing technology and economical instability, parents spend tremendous amount of their time at work. They overwhelmed with job`s duties and house holding responsibilities. Therefore, there is no timing space to devote it to the children. If parents are not available for such as role, regular teachers take part in it. Despite of a myriad of students in a class, it is a commitment of the teachers to educate students. In other words, the teachers get paid for the job and have to fulfill their responsibilities any ways, in daily basis. To that end, teachers participate much more in children`s education than parents.
Another reason is that regular teachers are trained professionals, who spend years on gaining skill to enable students to learn more. Teachers study different types of subjects, including child`s psychology, in order to enhance students intelligence. This way, the teachers in school are able to find weaknesses and strengths of a particular kid, pinpoint on them, and enable the child to eliminate obstacles in the learning process. Moreover, even if parents love their kids with all hart, they very often simply overlook the children`s endowment. This way, the teachers can give valuable advice to the parents about how to develop their child. For instance, if a kid has talent to draw, the teacher can to advice the parents to involve the child in a painting class. Because of that, the regular teachers more than the parents help to the children evolve and excel.
To sum it up, I feel that pedagogues facilitate to the children`s education a way more than the parents do. This is because, parents lack of free time and do not have necessary skills. All things considered, it is reasonable to assume that pedagogues are the best teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | sandiphinge86@gmail.com | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Pandalove | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | prayashpathak | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | mobinzaarreh | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | fofty | 70 | view |
- Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay. 73
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood Do you support or oppose this plan Why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 88
- In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good friend? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 3
- What are the good qualities or features of a good newspaper current affairs television program or news website Use specific details and examples to explain your answer 61
- Some young children spend a great amount of their time practicing sports. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that pedagogues are the best teachers.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, i feel, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05681818182 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97985228293 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.982988374 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7619047619 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7619047619 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2380952381 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147403737661 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586558469745 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861985136582 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128033879374 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728406223268 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.