Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Everyone in the word from first seconds that understand the meaning of the life, know that need education and consequently a good career. In the past or now, in every decades people have been worried about their future and job securities. In my opinion I disagree with that statement because of the following reasons that I describe bellow.
First of all think that you have a wonderful job, the position that you dream about it for a while. You could catch it and everything advanced in a good way. Suddenly do to economic crises the company bankrupt. I mean that economic crises are big and unforeseen threats for job security. These days situation show that reason clearly. No one did not know that a pandemic can change our lives. So many people lose their jobs, the ones that never thing about it. Sudden crises can change your future although you choose a good job.
Secondly, not only for job but also for everything in life, we cannot say any certain sentence. This world is full of unknown happens. We can plan for our career, future, marriage, kids, and so many thing but with an accident, everything can put down. My own experience is a compelling example of this, I work as an editor in the wedding photography atelier. Everything was good but after corona virus pandemic I lose my job. I never ever thing about something like that but it’s happen.
In conclusion, not only in the past but also nowadays too, we cannot say that it’s easy to determine what kind of job lead to have secure and brilliant future. Any job that you choose have a risk such how I describe in first and second reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...oreseen threats for job security. These days situation show that reason clearly. No ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
... career, future, marriage, kids, and so many thing but with an accident, everything can pu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...illiant future. Any job that you choose have a risk such how I describe in first and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, i mean, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 288.0 407.700716846 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63194444444 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39936334148 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2464069957 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.2105263158 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1578947368 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19456501606 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540251054187 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493842250182 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119699937217 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370276952651 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.