There is no shortage opinion about the types of jobs in the past and the market needed to fulfill any lack of jobs. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely select to agree with this idea because nowadays it is very hard to find a job within your major. It is my firm belief that determining your plan for the future in the past is easiest than today's decisions for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the next subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, these days it is hard to identify what type of major you have to study or what career you should learn to have an outstanding job. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. 30 years ago, it was easy to study anything and have a job after graduation because there was a scarcity of many positions in ministries or the public sector. My father graduated from the university as a civil engineer 30 years, and he had a job directly after graduation, so when I finished school, I decided to study civil engineering like my father because jobs in this field are easy to obtain. Unfortunately, after graduation, I did not find any job for four years because there are a lot of engineers in my country without work. If I had studied another major like cyber security, I would have found a job easily.
Secondly, professional jobs like smith and carpenter also have problems securing their lives because of increasing the population in the world and Increase the competition between them. Drawing from my own experience, in my town ten years there were five grocery markets while today there are more than 12 markets like them. Consequently, their profits decreased and a lot of them tried to open another market or expand their markets to include other items like yogurt and milk.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that planning for future jobs is more difficult today and it has many consequences. This is because more people have certificates from universities without having a job. After all, all jobs are filled, and an increasing number of people has another impact on all free jobs.
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish Recently workers in the 78
- The Plain of Jars is an archaeological site in the Southeast Asian country of Laos At the site hundreds of large stone jars ranging in size from one to three meters are scattered across the countryside These numerous large containers are around 2 000 year 78
- The golden frog is a small bright yellow amphibian that lives in and around mountain streams in Panama The species is severely endangered because of a fungus that infects the frog through its skin and inhibits the frog s critical life functions such as br 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, while, after all, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66489361702 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62017086896 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523936170213 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3121451069 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.933333333 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148020266196 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547154099714 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529541583609 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885518522876 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528853352046 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.