Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
With food being closely related to the health of every individual, much comparison has been made concerning the food eaten in the past and that eaten today. While some argue that people ate healthier food in the past because fast food was less popular at that time, I reckon, however, that people eat healthier food today.
First of all, people nowadays are equipped with more knowledge to choose the healthier food. At the time when computer and the Internet were not as pervasive as today, people only objected the food that appeared to be rotten. However, there is more delicate knowledge to decide whether a kind of food can be eaten than merely judging from the outside. For example, seafood can't be eaten together with alcoholic beverage, especially beer. Such knowledge hasn't been widely known until recently. Accordingly, people nowadays are able to make much wiser decisions considering food and better food choices lead to better health.
Moreover, with the development of economy, people care more about their health. Therefore, people aren't inclined to eat expired food as they tended to do before. For example, my mother used to tell me about her childhood when she had to eat pieces of bread that had been left in the house for a long time because her parents had bought too many of it when they were cheaper. Contrary to the past, people nowadays buy proper amount of food and even though some food is expired occasionally, they won't eat it due to healthy concerns. Thus, people eat healthier food today than in the past.
Finally, people can buy healthier food today because of the stress laid on environmental protection. In the past few years, several policies have been established to strictly constrain the waste emission of factories and plants. Since the pollution was much more serious in the past, it was more possible that crops got contaminated with water waste. As a result, people in the past ate more food with harmful chemicals such as heavy metals. Instead of being exposed to such danger, people nowadays had little chance to eat polluted food, thus assuring a better health condition.
In conclusion, people eat healthier food than they did in the past due to more nutritional knowledge, economic development and environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | Yuson | 70 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | ayiayi | 76 | view |
| 2019-06-30 | Frequency | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | reginaluna | 70 | view |
| 2018-09-06 | reginaluna | 70 | view |
- Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The use of devices that can be connected to the internet like computers phones and ipads should be prohibited from the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 57
- 13 Which area the government should fund to improve children s education 1 hiring more teachers to teach in a small class 2 preschool education before kinder garten 3 providing some training courses so that teachers can be more professional 80
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you c 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... from the outside. For example, seafood cant be eaten together with alcoholic bevera...
^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...verage, especially beer. Such knowledge hasnt been widely known until recently. Accor...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...e about their health. Therefore, people arent inclined to eat expired food as they te...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, however, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03947368421 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51501860024 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518421052632 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5729978731 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.789473684 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63157894737 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300176394976 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106737374351 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533338621211 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184615218492 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372471094656 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.