Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not
Since the education on students younger than 13 has always been an issue drawing much attention, it is widely debated whether younger students should be taught by only one teacher. While some argue that one teacher is enough to educate students of this age because what they learn is quite simple, I reckon, however, students will benefit from being taught by different teachers.
First of all, despite the fact that these subjects are indeed rather simple compared to those taught in high school or university, nobody can specialize in every subjects learnt by the young students. In light of it, students taught by different teachers can get equally valuable guidance concerning different subjects, which is a crucial factor in the children education. For example, it is true that a teacher who mainly takes the responsibility of math class is able to teach students in primary school to read and write. However, considering the reading class, this teacher wouldn’t be as professional as a language teacher who might help students cultivate the interest in reading with many attracting stories. As for children education, this interest means much more than just knowing how to read.
Moreover, many teachers enable the students to adapt to different teaching habits, which is a significant ability when students enter high school where all subjects are given by different teachers. If students are taught by only one teacher when they are young, chances are that they get attached to the teacher and consider that other teachers are not as good as this one. What’s worse, they might feel allergic about the lesson given by new teachers, which will be detrimental when they have to be faced with all kinds of characters of teachers in high school. On the contrary, students learn to keep up with the pace of different teachers much smoothly if they do so since primary school. In this way, they are able to take notes and catch the highlighted points no matter how a teacher gives the lesson.
Admittedly, having students taught by different people indeed have some shortcomings. For instance, the connection between students and teachers might be very tight and teachers might not be familiar with the kids, which is rather disagreeable for children education. However, this problem can be solved if teachers communicate with the parents of each kid more frequently and exchange their recent observations and opinions on the kids. In this way, teachers know more about their students and they can provide more delicate guidance.
In conclusion, it is more conducive for younger students if they are taught by different teachers instead of only one teacher because students will equally develop on different subjects and they can be prepared for middle school education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-23 | sepehrdsafaee | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | nikhil2798.gp | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | NegarMaghsoudi | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | NegarMaghsoudi | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Yuson | 73 | view |
- Your teacher assigns a project to you and you can select the members to work with choose the members who think and work in similar ways choose the members who have totally different ideas Which would you think is more effective to work with 72
- Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view 73
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 77
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at s 87
- 机经6 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, as for, for example, for instance, i reckon, in conclusion, first of all, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2351.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17841409692 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62383898911 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477973568282 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.5147829155 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.294117647 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7058823529 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504689765598 0.236089414692 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189912196774 0.076458572812 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111453573401 0.0737576698707 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343143698481 0.150856017488 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069204783364 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.