Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view

Essay topics:

Students aged 13-18 are taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are taught by only one teacher all day long. Some people suggest it would benefit young students to be taught by different teachers. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?

Since the dawn of civilization, education has played a prominent role in people's lives. It contains some successive stages having different characteristics one of which is the number of teachers hired for each level. There is a heating debate whether it's beneficial for children aged 13-18 to be instructed by several teachers. Some people are inclined towards having only one teacher, whereas others hold exactly the opposite perspective. As far as I am concerned, providing the students with different teachers could help them flourish in a more efficient way. In the following paragraphs, my viewpoint will be elucidated through two conspicuous reasons.

First and foremost, it is established beyond doubt that having several teachers in school culminates in an easier process of discovering students' skills. It is undeniable that each student is unique in his own way and he might have a special ability that is not probable/likely to be found out by one specific teacher. Chances of the capabilities to be discovered as well as cultivated are highly increased in the wake of incorporating several teachers. Take my nephew as an example. He was really enthusiastic about music and he could have followed this career ever since he started the primary school, but his first grade teacher was not really into music and did not pave the way for him to start this career. Had the school utilized different teachers in the primary levels, it could have helped my nephew to become more prosperous in his future stages of life.

The second pivotal reason that is worth being taken into account meticulously is that if the students face several teachers in the primary school, they will be able to develop a sense of sociability in an easier way. Obviously, when children have several teachers, they have to deal with people with different dispositions and communicate with them. Consequently, they will be a lot more socialized and more successful in solving the problems in the face of adversity. Based on a recent study, a host of people interacting with different people in their first stages of life, are more sociable people in their future and are equipped with more tools to deal with their difficulties. The more you communicate with people with diverse characteristics, the more you are capable of becoming successful in your life.

To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that hiring several teachers for young students could be a more reasonable approach. It is hard to disguise the fact that being faced with only one teacher might help the students to become relieved of stress, but it deprives them of being in an environment in which their skills could be fostered. Besides, being in an atmosphere containing different teachers, could help nurture their social skills. Therefore, I believe that the benefits of this option outweigh its drawbacks. It is highly recommended that schools pay a lot more attention to hiring several teachers for primary levels.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-23 sepehrdsafaee 76 view
2019-11-03 nikhil2798.gp 66 view
2019-10-20 NegarMaghsoudi 73 view
2019-10-20 NegarMaghsoudi 73 view
2019-10-10 Yuson 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user NegarMaghsoudi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 663, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng several teachers for primary levels.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, really, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2524.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10931174089 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87555505874 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485829959514 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3697236429 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.727272727 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281400496821 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869067436621 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502054600405 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194726700991 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467545442891 0.0645574589148 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.