Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is beyond doubt that with the dawn of human civilization, people have adopted new ways to spend a successful life as compared to the past. In this regard, taking profound decisions of a significant level is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars. Some contemplate that it is better for young people to make their own life-decisions while some reckon the idea of depending on parents for a better outcome. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the notion by disagreeing that young people are able to make good decisions on their own. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my viewpoint is that young people are not mature enough to understand all aspects related to a decision. It is notable that children with the group age of 12 to 21 do not have a well-developed brain. They tend to make choices on impulse and engage themselves in risk-taking behavior. As a result, they cry over a spilled milk due to bad circumstances. It is crystal clear that they do not oversee the long-term effects of their choice and prefer the current profit. Vividly, by doing immature activities they destroy their currier nowadays. However, in the past, the immerging generation of society respected their parents' thoughts and aided in the development of their country with passion. By way of illustration, 5 years ago my dad told me to marry a person whom I never met. Since I belong to a very conservative family, I decided to go with his choice and respected the ethics he taught me. 1 year later, I got married to that person and now I am happily married. Had I not listened to my father and denied his decision, I would not be satisfied with my life like most young people today. This example clearly explains my point.
The second exquisite reason behind my belief is rooted in the fact that children need parents because elders are experienced more than them. It is notable that parents have seen the insight and have spent more time struggling with life. As compared to the young generation, their decision-making quality is one step ahead. They have broken the ice for their kid strenuously. Thus, they better evaluate the situation in order to survive in this contemporary world. So, young people can incorporate their experts' choice with their knowledge to obtain innumerable achievements. As a case in mind to shed more light, 1 year ago my brother decided to start a business in California. He took all the possible advice from my father to enhance his business. Since my father had more experience with dealing with people, he guided him in a very profound way. As a result, he never faced any loss in business.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although taking life decisions makes the young generation independent but it could lead to adverse consequences for them. Therefore, taking parents' advice is recommended. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth reiterating: first, young people are immature, second, they need expert advice. As a writer, I vehemently urge people to listen to their parents to get success in their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 86 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | subashdevkota | 85 | view |
- Archeological lost artifacts 80
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Fiction or non fiction 76
- A coin is fake or real 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...arents for a better outcome. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the notion by d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2676.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 551.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85662431942 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80780961768 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531760435572 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0864863364 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.625 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.21875 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375873901099 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864191483735 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975850570682 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257622216739 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809619804473 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 473, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...arents for a better outcome. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the notion by d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2676.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 551.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85662431942 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80780961768 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531760435572 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0864863364 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.625 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.21875 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375873901099 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864191483735 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975850570682 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257622216739 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809619804473 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.