In today's world, different technologies are invented for entertainment and communication which have direct impact to the society. Some people believe that means of entertainment like television has involved people to spend their life on it and do not have time to interact with people. But I am not concurred with this idea and firm believe that because of the discovery of communication methods, people are in contact and touch with people more than before. I will explain this idea in the subsequent paragraph.
To begin with, there are abundant technology like viber, messenger and many more to communicate with each other which provide chance to talk with people in less money or in free of charge but in past the means of communication were more expensive than now and people used to spend their time on watching TV. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own experience. I am in abroad since five past years and I used to communicate less than twice in a week before three years because phone calls were too expensive at that time. But when I knew about the messenger by which we can chat with people through the video or audio call then I installed it. As a result I am able to call my friend and family twice a days and its free.
Secondly, people have personal vehicle and they do not suffer to wait for public vehicle and pay expensive fare. Now easy access of vehicles make people to go around where they want to visit whenever they like. It is beneficial that they should not stay at home and watch boring movies and serial all the time even they do not have any interest. Thereby, people can make conversation with each frequently than before.
Finally, the next thing people do not hang on TV but keep in touch with near and dear one is the security system. As world is systematically developed with security system people are not afraid to come out in night time as well. But in the past there was no abundant safety for people and they were afraid to go out though they get time at night time. But in current scenario, all the cities are filled with tight safety and rules because it it is possible to meet people whenever and wherever they get feel comfortable.
To sum up, in today, instead of spending time on TV people visit their friends and develop their relationship with them with the help of technologies as far as they are easily accessible to the people and cost free.
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 73
- Nowadays we communicate less with our family members To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
- Imagine you could improve the town where you live by changing one important thing Which of the following would you choose to do Building additional park construct more libraries Improve public transportation 70
- Nowadays people are busy with many things If you were given a short period of time what would you choose 1 Learn to play a new sport you never played 2 Learn to cook food in a different way 3 Learn to do some hand made work like clothes 75
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge e 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...many more to communicate with each other which provide chance to talk with people...
^^
Line 7, column 440, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...led with tight safety and rules because it it is possible to meet people whenever and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58769931663 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48209846323 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489749430524 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.050876147 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281669321604 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925069988982 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778482669846 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162225856083 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056036783441 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.