Television has served as a catalyst for social changes over the past few decades. It has evoked many changes in the way we behave, or the way we communicate. However, I opposed to the idea that People are communicating less often than in the past due to the advent of television. I will explore my opinion in the following sentences, offering examples.
Firstly, we are talking all the more often than before thanks to television. This is because we can get new pieces of information much more quickly and more widely than before through television. Television can offer brief breaking news. When I was in elementary school, I used to talk with my friends about a series of animation. We could share experiences, which ignited our communication, preventing me from being alone in the class.
In addition, television can kindle the relationship in a family. My personal memory serves as a compelling example of this. All of my family members used to gather when we took breakfast. During the meal, we watched a news program on television and discussed the domestic and international affairs. We continued this custom until I enrolled in university and started single living. This experience, which was very beneficial itself, have made me adept in critical thinking. What is important is that we can share the time while watching the screen. Therefore, television functions in a way that stimulates our talking.
Finally, television can connect people who live far away from each other. I have a pen pal from my childhood. He and I talk about stories from Disney channel from time to time. We do not share the same mother tongue, but the contents we watch on TV are broadcast in various languages in many cases. That was why we are still in contact. Drawing from this experience, we can say that television can inspire communication between people from all over the world.
For these three perspectives, I totally disagree with the opinion that people talk less than before due to the presence of television.
- Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- kouryaku
- kouryaku
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 60
- Question 37 Many people welcome the opening of shopping areas near their homes On the other hand some people are strongly opposed to the construction of such facilities If the opening of a large shopping center in your neighborhood were announced would yo 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83475708851 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4332523288 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1666666667 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169173611405 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469825072917 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535597161743 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11326744876 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563905761361 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.