Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Watching television is an activity that is extremely common and simple in lots of people daily routine. Personally, I disagree with the statement that watching television would lead to the decrease of time of communicate with others. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore more in the following essay.
To begin with, watching television could make people keep up with the trendy things. To be more specific, the trendy things, such as comedies, celebrities or other popular debating shows, you know, the more topic of the conversation you could talk to others. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I was at the senior high school, there are a TV series about the love affair. It is so popular that almost everyone knew that shows. However, I skip that shows because I keep focus on the up coming exam. That make me feel isolated with the whole classes. Other students are deferring the newest episode of the show, but I could not join in their conversation. I was so regret that I didn’t saw that shows at that time, because I can not start or participate in others. No one I could talk to make me feel upset and bleak.
Moreover, watching television could be the best life time spending with family. There are lots of TV shows or movies on the television are suitable to be watched by the family. For example, I will sit down with my whole family include my parent, my siblings and even our pet dog to watch the TV shows. The television gather my family together and it truly improved my family relationship and we keep saying about the shows in the living room until midnight. Watching television could not only get some relaxations, but also make me feel close to my family and increase the chance that talking to the family members.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that the television is not an obstacle between people and people to communicate. Nevertheless, it is an impressive tool to start a conversation with friends and spending more time talking with the family members.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-13 | _ashmita.upadhyay_ | 83 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | Nina Tsarevich | 75 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | Nina Tsarevich | 3 | view |
| 2022-06-17 | heman@saini | 60 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | joyce05 | 73 | view |
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 71
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of local and 60
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 55
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 71
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet Mars some think 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
..., watching television could be the best life time spending with family. There are lots of...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, you know, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75492957746 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66195543627 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495774647887 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3597228496 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191980888117 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622641968819 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062396084774 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135831343603 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472015923744 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.