Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People should buy the products made in their own country
Whether people should buy the products made in their own country is a complicated issue. Some people might argue that it's not necessary for people to buy their own country's products. However, after deep deliberation, I contend that people should buy the products produced in their own country for their own good.
Firstly, transportation increases the trend of global warming, and buying the product made nearby can decrease needs of transportation. The emission of carbon dioxide is the root cause of global warming. People produce a lot of carbon dioxide due to the consumption of crude oil by cars and trunks. If we buy the products produced abroad, then we will consume a huge amount of crude oil because of far distance transportation. But if humans buy the products produced nearby, then we can decrease the emission of carbon dioxide and slow down the trend of global warming. As a result, we can prevent ourselves from attacks of rising temperature.
Secondly, people can avoid harm by supervising the producing process more easily if they buy the goods made in their own country. The less the distance between consumers and producers, the more possibilities that consumers can give pressure to producers. The more pressure the producers have, the better the products can be. Moreover, our government can regulate native factories more easily. By contract, our government has less power to control foreign factories. Therefore, products made in our own country have higher qualities and are conducive to our health.
Admittedly, some people may argue that there are some advantages of buying foreign products, such as cheaper prices and more choices. However, in my opinion, the disadvantages are much more than the advantages. With the reasons I mentioned above I believe that people should buy the products made in their own country.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 50
- Do you agree or disagree In the past people were more interested in improving their neighborhood than they do now 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than the positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake The level of salt in the lake s water what scientists call its salinity has been increasing steadily for years because the lake s water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfal 80
- Is it as important for older people to learn and study new things as young people to do so 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether people should buy the products made in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77812686695 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503333333333 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.400348389 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340812064961 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123762361436 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145496902685 0.0737576698707 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236189988172 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141028013578 0.0645574589148 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.