Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in today’s world have become too dependent on automobiles. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, the automobile has become the main transportation method around the world. Personally, I believe people depend more on vehicles than ever before. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, People now are disinterested in the air pollution issue. Every year vehicles emit tonnes of toxic gasses into the air. However, many people ignore this fact by depending more and more on automobiles rather than using clean transportation methods such as bikes. For example, nowadays people in Jordan rely on vehicles more and more, even though the percentage of pollutants has exploded in the last couple of years. Jordanian citizens use automobiles everywhere and for every trip. So, the unawareness of the pollution issue and its harmful effects is one of the principal reasons for depending more on automobiles and not using clean transportation methods.
Second, the number of automobiles has ballooned in the last couple of decades. The increase in the number of vehicles is the second evidence that tells us how much we depend on automobiles in daily life. Nowadays the number of cars, buses and other transportation means has increased around the world. Consequently, the number of vehicle manufacturing factories has climbed. For instance, In Jordan, the number of cars has doubled since 1990. There is a car for every three citizens in Jordan, which is considered a great indicator of the number of cars in Jordan.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people nowadays depend heavily on automobiles to transport more than ever before. This is because of ignorance of the pollution dangers and the increase in the number of vehicles around the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | Blackcytrus | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-12 | ChiuYuan | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-06 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | zahrash75588 | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | zahrash75588 | 80 | view |
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 76
- The zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a ser 68
- During the eighteenth century the Rococo style became predominant in European art and architecture The style emphasized bright colors elaborate ornamentation and the use of playful designs and subject matter While Rococo artists dominated Europe for decad 73
- The cost of converting money from one national currency to another is very high Moreover differences in currency value can make market prices unstable discouraging international trade and travel A group of countries in Europe has been able to avoid many o 3
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 279.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22580645161 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84457324977 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508960573477 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9667046418 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7647058824 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157492349637 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057736040759 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491606964655 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110904710069 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457979333283 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.