Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Professors should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class.
Nowadays, Internet application is prevalent worldwide, and it enables handling a wide variety of tasks in different fields, particularly in science and knowledge. The education administrator doubts that it is right to cut access to the Interent for students during class. Using the internet in the classes looks like two edges of a sword, but I believe that the advantage of the internet during training outweighed the demerits. I will elaborate on my tendency in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the internet is provided a proper discipline to share information and serach to find our demands especially in class to be more informed. In other words, a bunch of information will be present by clicking some keywords in blinks of eyes. In past, it is challenging and time-consuming to find our investigation in different dictionaries, journals, books, and so on. I believe that the student could be more knowledgeable in-class topics by searching for some subject to discuss with their professor and classmate. Moreover, the class’s atmosphere is the best place to learn a subject and have a discussion to provoke student's mind. AS a result, a heated discussion and effective class by participating students would lead to learning topics by heart and boraden student's horizons in the knowledge.
Moreover, it is undeniable some of the students who are not interested in the class may want to utilize the internet in an unapporpriate direction, such as chatting or surfing on the internet but is it inevitable. Should education directors take measures to lead uninterested students in their course to the right circumstance, it will reduce the uninterested student in classes and unproper application during classes. My own example is compelling evidence to justify this subject. As far as I remember, When I was in undergraduate college, some of my classmates do not like our major, and they have did not participate in classes' discussion of reply to a professor's question regarding topics and consistently trying to kill time by catting and surfing on the Internet. After an in-depth conversation with them, I figured out that they did not like to attend at this classses. Afterwhile, they have changed their majors and fortunately are interested in a new major. As a result, I heard that they were very intersted to attend in their classes and discussing and leaving their habits to chatting in the class.
To sum up, As aforementioned, cutting internet not a proper way to absorb student's attention. The students could learn more descriptive and multidisciplinary by searching their needs during classes to enable discussion with the professor and maybe find their inquiry by searching on the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | ellen87713 | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Maedeee | 73 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 3
- frog population 80
- Some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions where there are many people Others like the ones with fewer people Which one do you prefer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in today's world have become too dependent on automobiles. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer." 76
- For the students aged 5 10 is it better to take a break for every one hour of instruction or let them focus on lessons for a longer period of time 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... my tendency in the following paragraphs First and foremost the internet is provi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 800, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raden students horizons in the knowledge Moreover it is undeniable some of the st...
^^^
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e knowledge Moreover it is undeniable some of the students who are not interested in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...tes do not like our major and they have did not participate in classes discussion o...
^^^
Line 3, column 1095, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng their habits to chatting in the class To sum up As aforementioned cutting inte...
^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir inquiry by searching on the internet
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, while, such as, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08636363636 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06592509599 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472727272727 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 440.0 20.1344086022 2185% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2238.0 100.406767564 2229% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 440.0 20.6045352989 2135% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 106.0 5.45110844103 1945% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165198462595 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165198462595 0.076458572812 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109596393874 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300774121215 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 222.5 11.7677419355 1891% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -375.12 58.1214874552 -645% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 174.9 10.1575268817 1722% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.72 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.09 8.01818996416 363% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 10.002688172 580% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 178.0 10.0537634409 1770% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 223.0 10.247311828 2176% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.