Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The governments offer different services to society to improve the citizens' life quality. In this line of thought, some people believe that the governors and the practitioners should build the required infrastructure to offer free internet to all people of society. Others, on the other hand, hold the opposite view and think that it is not beneficial to offer the internet for free. I, personally, concur with the latter group for two conspicuous reasons that I will elaborate upon hereunder.
The first exquisite reason that comes to mind is that by offering free internet, people of all ages from kids to old ones can use the internet without any limitation. With this in mind, children and teenagers who have impressionable minds will be dramatically influenced. To elucidate on, there are many inappropriate things on the internet like real violent videos, which can definitely detrimental effects on children and teenagers' mental health. For example, my boy is extremely curious about bed and scary news around the world. Since I do not buy internet traffic for him, he cannot watch these kinds of videos easily. However, if he could access the internet for free, I could not have controlled him and as a result, he would be affected by these adverse online contents.
Second, apparently, building and maintenance of the internet required an inordinate amount of money. To put it in other words, having a good internet service needs diverse assortments of equipment which are very expensive. On the other hand, in every society, many problems need investing money. Hence, it is not rational to spend money on some services like the internet the general public cannot take advantage of that. There are so many ways that governments can benefit people properly. For example, in our city, air pollution became a serious issue. Many people in my city suffer from respiratory diseases. Therefore, investing money in making more green space in my city should be prioritized because all people at every age and social level can benefit from it.
In conclusion, having the two mentioned reasons into account, I do believe that government should not offer the internet for free. In this way, the children can be protected from potential threats on the internet. Moreover, governmental budgets can be invested in better sections that are profitable for all members of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 80
- In 20 years from now on students will not use printed books any more 90
- People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- At one high school more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments For example many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments The school is considering making a change to 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70395576887 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555023923445 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4661703342 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.