Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
when it comes to the issues of getting access to use public services, such as roads constructions, water irrigations, and internet provide, most people will not treat the provide of internet equally as they are convinced that the access of internet can be offered with free access since it is not that significant for the majority of people in their lives. However, from my view of points, I disagree with the statements for two reasons.
First of all, with the development of technology and internet, there is an increasing number of digital devices existed to help people tackle the problems or difficulties, especially the uses of them become more and more popular among younger generation in the current era given the precious quality of sharing in the internet. Therefore, the demands of using the internet and get the access of it plays an essential role in helping people's lives. Once they are forbidden or prohibited from having the access, it will chaotic and messy just like having a real and visible traffic jam in the public highways, leading the bad consequence like delay in the transportation of goods and information. Hence, it is evidently for people to acknowledge how crucial the access of internet is and how to maintain the access can be obtained when facing millions of people in the public regions and abandon the outmoded opinions about no necessity of running and remaining the good access of using internet with expenditure or tariff as the more important it is, the more necessary for the administrator working for government to charge in order to guarantee the quality of internet access towards people in case there's artificial damages or digital viruses.
Furthermore, given the easy-sharing and rapidly-spreading out quality of the internet, it will be equally important just like how the public roads constructions or water irrigation systems are important as they have something in common. For instance, all of them can redistribute the goods or resources in order to decrease the original disparities among people with diverse socioeconomic and geographical inequalities. More specifically, people who lived in the rural areas can receive the goods produced in the urban markets due to the public transportation. people who lived in the drought regions can ensure the water irrigations thanks to the public sharing systems for irrigating. Thereby, people who cannot complete the tasks from a long distance can discuss about the sharing projects via emails or other instant communication applications online to collaborate better. In addition to this, the money of running such a rewarding internet access could be charged back to the pockets of the government. Only in this way can assure that there is always a macroeconomic administrator working with equities and equalities with adequate budgets that can be spent on the gaps of those imperfect and unequal places where people can shorter the distances with the public access of internet.
In conclusion, it is convincing for public to acknowledge the great importance and significance of providing the internet access just as crucial as other services, such as building the roads, additionally, people should pay for it helping a better arrangement of public events for government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
when it comes to the issues of getting acces...
^^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...net provide, most people will not treat the provide of internet equally as they are convinc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
... will not treat the provide of internet equally as they are convinced that the access of i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e with the statements for two reasons. First of all, with the development of te...
^^^
Line 3, column 1201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... internet access towards people in case theres artificial damages or digital viruses. ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtificial damages or digital viruses. Furthermore, given the easy-sharing and ...
^^^
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...rkets due to the public transportation. people who lived in the drought regions can en...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es with the public access of internet. In conclusion, it is convincing for publ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2754.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22580645161 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97493631919 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478178368121 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 871.2 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.146700295 48.9658058833 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.714285714 100.406767564 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.6428571429 20.6045352989 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270594565495 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100045077388 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076323519589 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200031421666 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598158498312 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 11.7677419355 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.46 58.1214874552 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 10.1575268817 186% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.