Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The shocking number of comments on young people's behaviors today makes the criticism them hard to be ignored. Some people believe that the main cause of factor leading to these comments is the outrageous behaviors of the young. However, some people maintainremain that it is the restrictions on young people that areis too strict. From where I stand, I am more in favor of the latter view because of the following three reasons.
First and foremost, a large portionpart of tradiontional rules, which today’sthe societies still expect the young to follow, have already been out of date and thus meaningless/pointless now. A case in point is the dress code for women. In the past, when the concept of gender equality could not evenrn be imagined, women were required to wear conservative clothes that covered every inch of their skin. However, it has become a major task now to educate the young women to break the gender stereotypes and unfair social rules. Consequently, the restrictions on women's clothes are no longer suitable in today's society. Apparently, the society should stop expecting the young people to follow traditional rules as such in order to make cultural progress.
Second, there is much evidence to suggest that too many rules and restrictions contribute to the disappearance of creativity in society. In other words, the trade-off between obedienceobeydance and creativity can not be avoided. Take myself as an example, my headmaster from senior highn is a very rigorous serious and strict teacher who set a great many a bunch of rules for our class to follow. As a result, wWhile our class is famous for deciplinediscipline in our school, we never won any competition regarding creativity such as art performance and design competition. Innovative ideas are likely to be killed when following the existing rules, rather than breaking the norm, is the rewarded behavior.
Finally, when the conventional rules describe/depict a role model for young people to imitate, the social diversity will be reduced dramatically. Typically, young people are expected to find a stable job right after graduation and start a family as soon as the income is reliable. Such expectations undoubtedly have shaped some successful figures in a traditional sense. Nevertheless, personalities such as adventurous and open are regarded as disadvantageous and will be discouraged. As a consequenceresult, what makes up the society will have nothing but one style of living.
In conclusion, I maintain that the restrictions on young people in modern society are too strict because a part of these rules are already out of date. In addition, they aretoo many rules will killing the creativity of young individuals and reducinge the diversity of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'kill'
Suggestion: kill
...n addition, they aretoo many rules will killing the creativity of young individuals and...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, finally, first, however, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2319.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23476297968 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2141473343 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559819413093 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7243321433 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.409090909 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.04545454545 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235489656644 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669765530666 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611210942127 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135322605926 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370127725384 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.