Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Scientific discoveries should be shared around the world. Government should not keep it privately.
Scientific discoveries reflect a country’s inherent competitive advantages. Every superpower in this era is, without exception, a technology powerhouse. In order to limit other countries’ growth, some governments might monopolize their scientific discoveries. However, I suspect sharing yields more benefits than drawbacks.
To begin with, sharing discoveries is a win-win situation. The government applies for a patent and then everyone gets benefits. For one thing, the government gets a right to exclusively use discoveries for a period of time. Although its discoveries are published , they are only used for research. For another thing, other countries can save a fortune. They avoid wasting time and effort researching something that someone has found before. Admittedly, the patent right can not protect some discoveries such as the law of nature. As for those discoveries, the government earns a reputation for its great academic achievements.
Secondly, the government shall share some discoveries on the humanitarian grounds. If one discovery is able to reduce starvation, diseases and even poverty, the government should release it. There is no reason outweighs saving lives. The new hybrid rice is a classic example. It is able to grow on poor land and produce high yield. Sharing and expanding it can greatly decrease undernourished people around the world. If a government keeps such types of discoveries secretly, it has no sense of social responsibility.
Lastly, sharing scientific discoveries promotes international cooperation. Simply put, sharing is a part of cooperation. In the common life, people prefer staying with friends who readily share their discoveries. That is the same between countries. A government that opposes sharing hardly get assistance from other countries, let alone cooperation. Over time, the government is isolated from the international community. Besides, some discoveries are not conclusions. As the research goes further, the government might lack resources, technologies, scientists or even cash. If it shares the discovery, the government can ask other countries for support and finally accelerate efficiency.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a member of a team than as an individual in order to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 70
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community Do you support or oppose the factory Explain your position 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ht to exclusively use discoveries for a period of time. Although its discoveries are published...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... Although its discoveries are published , they are only used for research. For an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, another thing, as for, such as, for another thing, for one thing, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 52.1666666667 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76947040498 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24262866188 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613707165109 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.448921614 48.9658058833 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.1428571429 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 11.4642857143 20.6045352989 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231739555517 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587531332824 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048462542073 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14098209721 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512742438008 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.39 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.0 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.